Democrats crying ‘wolf’ incite assaults on police stressing them to break

SC shooting

After being assaulted during a routine traffic stop, this officer responds with excessive force.  Democrat’s crying “wolf” and inciting attacks on police have stressed them to the breaking point.  Liberal media is to blame, but they’ll be happy to now have their poster boy for police brutality on which to hang their agenda.

With Democrats crying, “Robbery, rape, and murder” with the help of the liberal media perpetuating their lies, criminal assaults and shootings of police are at an all time high.  The result of this is that officers are stressed to the breaking point, ready to snap at any attack on themselves.  The shooting in South Carolina is nothing more than what leftists have fostered in society.  No doubt they will increase their calls for police to be disarmed so Democrat criminals can rule the street.

Bad shoot – Democrats have no one to blame but themselves

Because of the atmosphere fostered by Democrats crying “wolf” and inciting assaults of police, officers are stressed to the breaking point and are liable to snap giving leftists exactly what they want – a dead martyr’s head to hang on their lying cause.  Having already had their lies over the shootings of four dead criminals exposed they now they have what they have been hoping for, what they have been working for; an actual bad shooting.  Under the hyper-stressed conditions officers have to operate in these days of liberal lies, this officer should not be charged with murder, but simply dismissed from the force.  Let the Democrats eat the crow when this cop is convicted of, at most, manslaughter.

Contrary to the claims of the #blacklivesmatter propagandists, this officer was charged with murder.  These same people damned the justice system for not charging the officer in Ferguson even though their guy, AG Holder in the DoJ, admitted the claim that Brown was murdered while surrendering to be a lie.  Justice is not served by charging everyone with a crime just because of bogus claims to make them go to court.

From “hand up, don’t shoot” to UVA gang rape, liberals have been promoting one lie after another in the Democrat media.  The Ferguson lie has led to the deaths of several police officers and the shooting of many more.  Officers nationwide are under great stress making them more liable to overreact.  The Left will strive to make this officer their scapegoat and make the criminal who was assaulting him their martyr rather than teach the lesson: Don’t attack a man with a gun.

The days of leftwing “gotcha” journalism must be brought down and media held liable for their malpractice and malfeasance.  The Democrat Party has become the party of the most vile corruption, lies, and deceits in the history of this nation even to the point of holding themselves guiltless of slander if spoken from the floor of the Senate!  America’s young are being corrupted and told not to listen to the truth, and that will be the undoing of the greatest nation on Earth.

Democrats live the Big Lie and laugh at congressional crimes

Related articles;

Obama sets savages loose to shoot police over ‘legitimate’ grievances

Patriotic Democrat is an oxymoron – when criminals rule

Racism – the colossal ignorance of the Left’s language of division

Other articles;

Climate change deniers vs. Chicken Littles

Foreign policy successes on the road to naming Obama Grand Mufti

The Final Solution to Islamic terrorism

Proof of fraud – the Democrat agenda to tax American wealth

 

 (Please like, follow, and share this with your friends.  Let them know the truth.)

About dustyk103

This site is my opinion only and is unpaid. I am a retired Paramedic/Firefighter with 25 years of service in the City of Dallas Fire Dept. I have a B.A. degree in Journalism, and A.A. degrees in Military Science and History. I have spent my life studying military history, world history, American history, science, current events, and politics making me a qualified PhD, Senior Fellow of the Limbaugh Institute, and tenured Professor for Advanced Conservative Studies. 😄 It is my hope that readers can gain some knowledge and wisdom from my articles.
This entry was posted in Gun Control, Racism and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Democrats crying ‘wolf’ incite assaults on police stressing them to break

  1. hampshirehog says:

    Reblogged this on hampshire Hog and commented:
    Far right fantacist who thinks that the murderer in this case was egged on…

    Like

  2. dustyk103 says:

    On FB:

    Cynthia Barnes Nordstrom · Top Commenter · Arizona State University
    What the H#LL are you taking about. How did any liberal comment lead to a cop killing an unarmed father???? Found nothing other than your EXTREME right wing website, that has some pretty questionable content…I actually check facts, try it. Typical extremist. No facts, no sense, no credibility to intelligent, reasonable people. Wow, reaching, dusty, reaching.
    Reply · Like · 15 seconds ago

    Dusty Koellhoffer · Top Commenter · University of Georgia · 120 followers
    Typical liberal b.s. Attack the messenger to defame the message. How many cops have been murdered in the name of Ferguson over the last few months? That’s an actual fact you can shove into your liberal brain.
    Reply · Like · Unfollow Post · 2 seconds ago

    Susan Barb · Top Commenter · Graceland University
    Cynthia Barnes Nordstrom From the video I have seen, on Fox News by the way, this police officer appears to be in the wrong. Including the documentation of him planting his Taser on the victim. Dusty, I almost always agree with you, but this I think you may have gotten this one wrong. That being said, everything true will come out after an investigation, and if the officer was in the right, I will be as vocal at supporting him as I am now in questioning (notice I did not say condeming) him.
    Reply · Like · 16 minutes ago

    Dusty Koellhoffer · Top Commenter · University of Georgia · 121 followers
    I don’t believe the officer was justified in this shooting as I made clear in the article. I just think that this is the result of all the lies across the country about police shootings and the threat to police that this officer blew a gasket when the guy attacked him over a routine traffic stop. After he realize what he did wrong he tried to cover it up. This is the rare exception, not the rule that the Left has been trying to make it out to be.
    Reply · Like · Unfollow Post · 2 seconds ago

    Susan Barb · Top Commenter · Graceland University
    And yes, Dusty, the family of every police officer killed in the name of Ferguson should be able to file suit for civil rights violations
    Reply · Like · 2 · Follow Post · April 8 at 6:10pm

    Susan Barb · Top Commenter · Graceland University
    Cynthia Barnes Nordstrom I originally agreed with most of your comment and I still do, but many of the liberal comments about the aftermath of Furgeson were untrue. I have noticed that many of the left leaning pundits have dropped most references to the Brown killing – that says to me that they realize that the narrative was not correct. That being said ( and I hate that phrase) most of the rioting in MO was encouraged the by Sharpton Racist Machine, Inc. In Philadelphia ( I reside in the immediate area) the majority of police officers killed are killed by African Americans, but the majority killed are White. Sorry if that upsets you. The latest police officer killed was an African-American – a month ago, was a married father of two – was killed by a Black Muslim ( he had that little dent in his forehead from kneeling to Alllah – and that is his right. Where was Sharpton and Jackson railing about Black men being killed. Where were they when this heroic police officerwas documented on camera as making himself a target by moving away from the people in the store so that he drew the fire from the robbers to himself.
    Reply · Like · 5 · Follow Post · Edited · April 8 at 6:28pm

    Susan Barb · Top Commenter · Graceland University
    By the way, he was on break and walked into the GameStop to buy his son a video game because his birthday was coming up and he wanted to reward the boy for getting straight A’s at school.
    Reply · Like · 4 · Follow Post · April 8 at 6:30pm

    Susan Barb · Top Commenter · Graceland University
    Dusty — i honestly don’t know. And that is all I can say
    Reply · Like · 2 · Follow Post · April 8 at 7:23pm

    Susan Barb · Top Commenter · Graceland University
    I edited this to indicate that he was a heroic police officer.
    Reply · Like · 3 · Follow Post · April 8 at 7:26pm

    Cynthia Barnes Nordstrom · Top Commenter · Arizona State University
    Well, even FoxNews (sic) had to acknowledge a man being shot in the back, who was no risk or hazard to anyone, was a bad idea. Where are conservative white leaders when young black men are being by white officers? How about the Sikh that was murdered by an ultra-right extremist because he was stupid enough to belief he was Muslim. Where was the outrage from the right? What is it with the right? Whenever a minority is abused or killed by a white officer all that most can do is sputter with…but, but, but what about the black person who…. or, repeat the same false, irrelevant and misleading reports: it was incredible how they shifted all the blame on Martin when Zimmerman stalked him with a loaded weapon, in the dark, not in a uniform, looking like a thug and probably scaring the kid half to death..he may have thought this husky, shaved head guy with a gun was out to hurt him…oh, wait, only a white person can be scared when something like that happens. Racism isn’t color blind, but instead of saying/accepting there are a small percentage racist, abusive white cops and organized, armed groups who want to hurt minorities, conservatives ignore those facts and counter attack. Fact: there are bad cops. Fact: there are violent, racist whites FACT: majority of cops are good, decent and honorable. FACT: most whites aren’t ignorant racists. Just saying…
    Reply · Like · Follow Post · 10 hours ago

    Cynthia Barnes Nordstrom · Top Commenter · Arizona State University
    How about the minorities killed after 9/11, for instance? Like the Sikh in Arizona. Or attacked just because they are black, brown, gay….???? And now, the 10 deputies who kicked a man in the head, beating him even after it appeared he had surrendered. The guy is no innocent, but HE WAS NO THREAT. Now, start spinning.
    Reply · Like · Follow Post · 10 hours ago

    Dusty Koellhoffer · Top Commenter · University of Georgia · 122 followers
    Where is the “outrage” on the Right? Simple – it is unnecessary because justice is being done. They who committed those murders are being charged. The Left is outraged when police and people who are the victims of violent criminals are NOT charged for killing in SELF-DEFENSE! My response to your charge that the Right is unjust is GFY!
    Reply · Like · Unfollow Post · 2 seconds ago

    Cynthia Barnes Nordstrom · Top Commenter · Arizona State University
    This will be long, because the Rights ingrained, self imposed ignorance prevents you from doing your own fact checking, research. You demand facts, back up, sources, but will present opinions as facts, without any justification. So…
    Those cops who committed murders are not all charged and if charged, as in SC, not one police officer who was charged has ever been convicted, regardless of the evidence. So your first point of ‘opinion/fact’ is wrong. Your attitude that the Left is outraged when a person acting in self defense isn’t charged has no basis in fact, but is entirely an opinion based on ignorance that is self-inflicted. We want to see every egregious act prosecuted, regardless of profession, race or personal belief. What the Left and the Right differ on is what constitutes self-defence. Killing someone for stepping onto your property, without threat to any life, is not self-defense in literal definition, only through insane ‘stand your ground’ legislation.
    After Colorado passed their version of the law, a woman stated she was happy because now she could shoot those kids her had take her ($5, walmart) garden gnome. I wonder, did you, for instance, ever TP someone’s house or take a gnome to dress in opposing school colors before the big game? If you did it today in some stands, you’d be dead.
    Other areas of disagreement:
    Zimmerman stalked a young man because he was black, wore a hoodie and ‘didn’t belong’ in the neighborhood. Zimmerman is stocky, was wearing black clothes, not a uniform and was armed. He FOLLOWED this young black man, probably scaring the cr*p out of him (you’d too, probably). So, when this hulking skinhead, all in black, with a gun, approaches and confronts this kid, the kid ‘stood his ground’ against an unknown armed man. Zimmerman…self-defense, BS. Yeah, we disagree here.
    How about the guy in Florida, Horn, who thought someone was maybe, going to burglarize his NEIGHBOR’s house. After being warned by police (ala zimmerman) to remain inside his home, Horn stated he would shoot, telling the operator, “ ‘I have a right to protect myself too, sir. The laws have been changed in this country since September the first, and you know it.’ ” Protect himself??? He went after them, not even on his property, police on the way. He killed two men, no charges.
    In Louisiana, a grand jury cleared 21-year-old Byron Thomas after he fired into an SUV filled with teenagers after an alleged marijuana transaction went sour. One of the bullets struck and killed 15-year-old Jamonta Miles. Even though no one in the car had shown or fired a gun and the SUV was driving away when Thomas opened fire, Lafourche Parish Sheriff Craig Webre said that as far as Thomas knew, someone could have jumped out of the vehicle with a gun, Thomas had “decided to stand his ground.” What??? Alleged this, unknowns and unfounded beliefs..I think YOU may have a gun and may come after me, so ‘bang’, I was just standing my ground…
    The Right has passed laws so that someone can shoot and kill someone just for being on their property, showing no threats or even armed. That means you guys have to watch out. Don’t walk in front of a car in a fast food drive thru…
    Cordell Jude shot and killed Daniel Adkins, who walked in front of Jude’s car just as he was pulling up to the window of a Taco Bell drive-thru in Arizona. Jude claimed Adkins had waved his arms in the air, with what Judge “thought” was a metal pipe and was actually a dog leash.(a lose, limp dog leash sure looks like metal pipe) Jude shot Adkins in the chest. My state, Arizona, the great bastion of extreme right views, passed a Stand Your Ground law in 2010.
    Miami judge tossed out a second-degree murder charge against Greyston Garcia after he chased a suspected burglar more than a block and stabbed him to death. The judge decided the stabbing was justified because the burglar had swung a bag of stolen car radios at Garcia – an object that a medical examiner at a hearing testified could cause “serious harm or death.” The judge found Garcia was “well within his rights to pursue the victim and demand the return of his property.” Demand, maybe, kill…WTF??
    Right is always ready to compare pencils and even sticks to ‘dangerous’ weapons in response to premise guns, that are manufactured for one purpose only, to do harm, are dangerous in wrong hands. Now, you like to say a kid going onto someone’s property to retrieve a ball can be threatened with a gun (happened), standing on neighbor’s property can be killed, standing on sidewalk in front of your property can be killed, someone who has not threatened or even posed a threat can be killed when no one’s life is threatened…just a yard gnome:
    How about Douglas Zerby, who was watering his lawn when neighbors, completely brainwashed even though they were NEIGHBORS, called the cops because they saw Zerby holding what they thought was a gun. It was actually a water hose nozzle. Officers approached Zerby and without any warning whatsoever, opened fire, fatally wounding him with 12 rounds that entered his chest arms and lower legs.
    So, yeah, we are different in our opinions and in educating ourselves to the facts and repercussions. Many of the new laws and the attitude of the right will come back to bite them in the butt when one of them is the victim.
    The Left supports law enforcement as a whole, but good cops in practice. The Right says all cops are justified, regardless of the circumstances. Cops have a tough, dangerous job, no argument, but law enforcement are people. People aren’t all stable, unbiased and dedicated. Like any part of society, there are racist, unstable and dangerous sociopaths in law enforcement. Those are the cops the Left wants gone, and if the break the law or act recklessly/deadly, they should be charged and if guilty, convicted. The right ways anyone, anytime can shoot to kill as long as they say they were scared/threatened, regardless of the facts and there is no such thing as a cop making a deadly mistake. We are for justice for all, the right is for selective justice, excuses and are truly bigoted (not necessarily racist), who think ‘good’ only applies to them.
    Reply · Like · Unfollow Post · 4 hours ago

    Like

  3. Arthur W. DiMatteo says:

    So when the media talks about police brutality, that stresses the police out and causes them to engage in more strident police brutality? Is that seriously your entire argument? Who cares, even if your point were correct, it doesn’t really matter, it still wouldn’t excuse shooting an unarmed man in the back. Oh and you also seem to imply that voters who regularly vote Democratic are somehow hoping and wanting minorities to end up dead in order to jail innocent police officers and create anarchy in the streets – is that what you believe, or have I gotten it wrong? It would be pretty sick to think that, demonizing fellow citizens that hold different opinions, but that does seem to be the earnest expression being put forth in this article. I don’t think anyone in America who isn’t a sociopath or psychopath really wants more people killed violently. Saying a “bad shooting” is “what they have been hoping for, what they have been working for” is trying to turn your political adversaries into monsters, not something you would do if you looked at opposing views with an open mind.

    Like

    • dustyk103 says:

      No, that’s NOT my argument. I said nothing about police brutality being aggravated by media coverage of police brutality. My argument is that police are being assaulted and shot at much more because of the lies told in the media by Democrats and this is causing great stress among officers who face greater danger as a result. I did not excuse the shooting, but said the officer used excessive force (kinda obvious from the video). I point out that he may have overreacted because he snapped from stress over because he was being assaulted over a routine traffic stop. That he acted wrongly is clear, but the fact remains that Democrats have been manufacturing phony incidents to promote a lie – that police hunt and murder blacks. This incident gives them the very picture they’ve been promoting. For me to say it is what they have been hoping for is not me turning them into monsters. This is no different than Democrats advocating for more American soldiers to be killed in the Iraq War. I’m not a sociopath who was hoping for this, but the criminals who wanted this are and they will be cheering having a picture to go on their #blacklivesmatter poster. (p.s. I fixed your typo for you. Does this site not enable you to edit your own post? They should fix that.)

      Like

  4. dustyk103 says:

    A post on FB:

    Alan Turner · Top Commenter · Wilmington, Delaware
    Makes perfect sense. The stress of news reports by Democrats can make an otherwise rational cop think that someone running away is threatening his life.

    I have to admit that I never thought of it that way before.
    Reply · Like · Edited · 5 minutes ago

    Dusty Koellhoffer · Top Commenter · University of Georgia · 121 followers
    Ridiculous. It makes an otherwise rational cop lose control and start shooting when he shouldn’t. When the perp was assaulting him trying to grab a weapon from him then he was in danger. The moral is; don’t attack people who have guns.
    Reply · Like · Unfollow Post · 2 seconds ago

    Alan Turner · Top Commenter · Wilmington, Delaware
    Dusty Koellhoffer Either this Democrat infiltration of the news media is so pernicious that many police officers are shooting when they shouldn’t, or Officer Slager is a rare case of a cop being unsuited for his job. Which do you think it is?
    Reply · Like · 2 minutes ago

    Dusty Koellhoffer · Top Commenter · University of Georgia · 122 followers
    You give two propositions that are separate questions. While it is true Officer Slager proved to be unsuited for the job at the moment of truth, it is also true that many officers are now not shooting when they should. And while police shootings are down, crime is up!
    Reply · Like · Unfollow Post · Edited · about a minute ago

    Alan Turner · Top Commenter · Wilmington, Delaware
    It was just one question: if Democrat news media made “an otherwise rational cop lose control and start shooting when he shouldn’t”, is this common, or was Slager an outlier?

    In any event your two subject changing comments aren’t borne out by statistics:

    Police officer deaths: (National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund)
    year: number
    2008: 148
    2010: 161
    2012: 126
    2014: 117

    Crime rate per 100,000 population (FBI)
    year: violent / property
    2008: 458.6 / 3214.6
    2010: 404.5 / 2945.9
    2012: 386.9 / 2859.2
    Reply · Like · Follow Post · Edited · 4 hours ago

    Mike Wilcox · Follow · Top Commenter
    Alan Turner THAT’S STRETCHING A BIT, DONT YOU THINK ?

    HOW ABOUT THAT THE DOOFUS SHOULDNT HAVE RAN ?
    Reply · Like · Follow Post · 3 hours ago

    Paul Bade · Top Commenter · Mankato, Minnesota
    Is this a “rare” case of a cop being unsuited for his job? Some people should never be police officers. Others start out well, but get burned out by constant dealing with the dregs of society. Those in the latter group become cynical about everybody, and instead of “protect and serve” their attitude becomes a callous “me against them.” As a member of a civic organization, I’ve met a number of police personnel. Most are decent enough, but some are bad-mannered jerks. The jerks are more likely to cause a routine admonitory situation (such as a bad tail light warning) to escalate into an arrest or worse.

    Police departments need to regularly evaluate their officers to make sure they aren’t suffering from an erosion in values and trained-in inhibitions. Regular rotation of duties, even to other city departments, would probably also help.
    Reply · Like · Follow Post · Edited · 3 hours ago

    Dusty Koellhoffer · Top Commenter · University of Georgia · 122 followers
    Alan Turner, your statistics are sadly lacking being years old and all prior to Ferguson fallout. And, again, I didn’t say the media is causing police to lose control. I said they were inciting violence against police and police are under greater stress because of it.
    Reply · Like · Unfollow Post · 2 seconds ago

    Alan Turner · Top Commenter · Wilmington, Delaware
    Where do reliable statistics ahead of the latest from the FBI and NLEOMF come from? I am all ears.

    My question remains the same no matter how you rephrase your premise: Is Slager an outlier in succumbing to this greater stress, or are unjustified police shootings routine events now?
    Reply · Like · Unfollow Post · 14 hours ago

    Dusty Koellhoffer · Top Commenter · University of Georgia · 122 followers
    You’re kinda thick to not understand my answer I’ve already repeated.
    Reply · Like · Unfollow Post · 10 hours ago

    Alan Turner · Top Commenter · Wilmington, Delaware
    No, you’ve simply avoided answering it. Is Slager an unusual case, or are unjustified police shootings now common? It’s a simple binary question: at least one of those is true, and they cannot both be true.
    Reply · Like · Unfollow Post · 4 hours ago

    Dusty Koellhoffer · Top Commenter · University of Georgia · 122 followers
    Of course they can. They are not opposites. Slager is an individual case and you are trying to make one case apply to all. That’s the definition of bigotry.
    Reply · Like · Unfollow Post · 2 seconds ago

    Alan Turner · Top Commenter · Wilmington, Delaware
    I’m not trying to make one case apply to all in any way. All I have asked is if this individual case is unusual or not.

    If it is, it has one implication for your article’s hypothesis: that media bias has affected one cop. While a tragedy, in the big picture that is not something to worry about.

    If this case is not unusual, then the implication is that a significant number of cops are unsuited for their job. That would be a problem regardless of the cause.
    Reply · Like · Unfollow Post · about an hour ago

    Dusty Koellhoffer · Top Commenter · University of Georgia · 122 followers
    I’m afraid that your conclusion is completely illogical. The fact that this cop went overboard is not proof that the Democrat media lies have no effect. The lies about Ferguson and other shootings by police have been inflated by the media to the point that police are being ambushed and murdered. The perpetrators cite revenge for Ferguson as their motive.

    That cops are being ambushed is causing them stress throughout the nation. This is not supposition, this is fact. Many cops are abstaining from shooting black criminals because they don’t want the media raising a pitchfork wielding mob against them. Some cops, like this one, will channel that stress into shooting when he shouldn’t. This is not rocket science. I am not dodging your question. You just are not understanding the facts, but convoluting the actions of one and the stress of all as requiring the same outcome by all, and that is not reasonable.
    Reply · Like · Unfollow Post · 2 seconds ago

    Alan Turner · Top Commenter · Wilmington, Delaware
    “The lies about Ferguson and other shootings by police have been inflated by the media to the point that police are being ambushed and murdered.”

    Speaking of lies, no police officers in the United States have died since Ferguson. Not even of heart attacks, let alone murdered in an ambush.
    Reply · Like · Unfollow Post · 8 minutes ago

    Dusty Koellhoffer · Top Commenter · University of Georgia · 122 followers
    And the other shoe drops explaining why you are denying facts and logic. There have been several police around the country murdered by perpetrators citing revenge for Ferguson and other media lies about cops killing blacks, most notably two NYC cops ambushed while sitting in their car. You deny this and I’m done with you.
    Reply · Like · Unfollow Post · Edited · 4 minutes ago

    Like

    • terry nelson says:

      while we are on this subject does this not tell all offenders its ok to run and nothing will happen to you ..even if you just killed ,raped ,stole someone car,,whatever the case may be..and also who can sit on this officers jury without saying he is already guilty of this crime.seems to me I have seen all the videos and there are a lot of questions that have not been answered as to the video not showing the part when they were on the ground and at the start of the video he knocks the tazer out of the officers hand and he runs not once but twice from the officer.18000 in child support and what ever else this man has done does not give him the right to run…but this will be the new thing when a police pull,stop or anything this running will be the thing to do when you get stopped.also I think these are setting up the police for all kind of lawsuits all for money.watch and see

      Like

  5. dustyk103 says:

    A FB exchange:

    Bob Kutz · Top Commenter
    Yeah, I choose to hang this one on all the liberals who teach young black men to violently confront or flee from cops. This guy didn’t have his hands up either. Maybe he didn’t get what he deserved, but then, he got what he asked for. It’s simple; don’t fight the police, don’t run from the pollice. Go down town, get some coffee and maybe a lawyer, and figure it out. You may pay a fine, you may sit down for a couple months. But you live.

    Liberal dogma is responsible for the deaths of more young black men then the Ku Klux Klan.
    Reply · Like · 6 · Follow Post · April 8 at 4:49pm

    Harold E. Lennerton · Top Commenter
    Still, getting shot 5 or 6 times in the back for running away? Ouch!
    Reply · Like · 1 · April 8 at 6:15pm

    Heidi Carlson · Top Commenter · Claremont Graduate University
    Bob, he did not deserve it or ask for it!

    The Supreme Court has held that an officer may use deadly force against a fleeing suspect only when there is probable cause that the suspect “poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.” He was stopped for a broken tail light…he certainly did not pose a threat to the officer since he was running away from the officer and the officer did not have any reason to believe that he was a threat to others. The officer could have put a warrant out for his arrest. To claim that he asked for it is frightening…it was murder.
    Reply · Like · 1 · April 8 at 9:05pm

    Heidi Carlson · Top Commenter · Claremont Graduate University
    In addition, liberal dogma had nothing to do with this…it was a police officer who made the decision to shoot a citizen in the back while he was running away.
    Reply · Like · 1 · April 8 at 9:06pm

    Michael Gluck · Top Commenter · University of Miami
    How can you possibly watch this video and come to the conclusion that liberals are in anyway at fault?

    Forty years of LBJ’s Great Society Programs are certainly responsible for the dissolution of the nuclear black family, but they have never promoted fighting with and fleeing from the cops.

    This is a bad cop plain and simple who will be prosecuted for willfully shooting a fleeing suspect in the back without any threat to his personal safety.
    Reply · Like · Follow Post · April 8 at 9:35pm

    Kyle Galpin · Top Commenter
    Bob Kutz, How stupid are you?
    Reply · Like · Follow Post · Edited · April 8 at 11:09pm

    Reeve Downes · Top Commenter
    This has nothing to do with liberals or conservatives. It has to do with the criminal actions of one police officer he has been arrested and looks like he will spend his life in prison were he can’t harm the rest of us. I would hope that everyone liberal or conservative condemns murder.
    Reply · Like · 1 · Follow Post · Yesterday at 3:43am

    Keith W Hoffman · Top Commenter · Sr Manager of Business Intelligence and Reporting at Comcast Xfinity
    Disagree wholeheartedly. Yes, he shouldn’t have fled, but that is no excuse for shooting someone in the back like that. If he shot low at his legs I’d at least be a little more forgiving, but this is just awful.
    Reply · Like · Follow Post · Yesterday at 7:06am

    Joe Hedge · Top Commenter · Works at Digital Imaging Technician
    Bob Kutz You’re a pathetic idiot. You have no idea what you would do if the cops tased you, you might start running too. You can’t predict someone’s behavior when they’re being tortured. Keep your stupid, ignorant drivel to yourself, a**hole.
    Reply · Like · Follow Post · 22 hours ago

    James Hendrixs · Follow · Top Commenter · Gainesville, Florida
    You don’t have to answer that one, Bob!
    Reply · Like · Follow Post · 21 hours ago

    Bill Filice · Top Commenter · Works at Self employed
    Bull Crap! This one is on the Cops! I supported Darren Wilson but this is flat out Murder 1.
    Reply · Like · Follow Post · 19 hours ago

    Bob Kutz · Top Commenter
    Harold E. Lennerton Yeah, definitely a bad cop here. But the problem arose when the perp chose to go fugitive. Bad things happen to you when you run from the law.

    And yes, Heidi, when you run from a cop, you are asking that that cop pursue you and forcibly detain you. Forcibly. When you run, force is immediately a part of the equation. This cop used too much force. If the guy had submitted to the arrest, there wouldn’t have been any need for force.
    Reply · Like · Follow Post · about an hour ago

    Bob Kutz · Top Commenter
    Heidi Carlson Cops only resort to force when the perp attempts to flee. If this guy had submitted to the arrest, the cop would not have used force. That simple. Not saying the cop was right, or that the cop shouldn’t be fired and charged with manslaughter, I am simply pointing out that liberal dogma teaches young black me to resist and/or flee and this is frequently the place where things go very badly for the perp.

    Submit to the arrest, go downtown and talk it out. Don’t run; don’t die.

    And yes, this liberal dogma has killed more young black men than the KKK. Easily shown to be true.

    Oh, and the KKK? Yeah, brought to you by the DNC. You can look it up.
    Reply · Like · Follow Post · about an hour ago

    Dusty Koellhoffer · Top Commenter · University of Georgia · 122 followers
    This is not Murder 1.

    1st degree murder is premeditated. Slagel didn’t get in his car that morning with the intention of hunting down Scott and killing him.

    2nd degree murder is unpremeditated, killing someone while in commission of a crime. Slagel wasn’t committing a crime, Scott was the one committing felony assault of a police officer.

    3rd degree murder is manslaughter, and it is either aggravated – killing someone either in the heat of the moment while in an argument or fight, or accidentally killing them by doing something irresponsible like driving drunk.

    Officer Slagel will be convicted, at most, of 3rd degree. And the Left will go ape shit over it.
    Reply · Like · Unfollow Post · 2 seconds ago

    Like

  6. dustyk103 says:

    Another FB post by a nasty Democrat fool stalker:

    Ab_Iorwerth Dusty Koellhoffer • 32 minutes ago
    That blog post was offensively stupid, outside of the grammatical and logical mistakes.

    This isn’t the first time you’ve linked to that rag, as well, and attempted to paraphrase from it without any critical thought of your own. Are you an actual thinking, feeling human being, or do you just wait to be told what to think from ironically race baiting clowns?

    Democrats have no one to blame for the bad shooting in SC but themselves
    The “Democrat’s” (per the article’s hilarious grammar) have nothing to do with a cop improperly escalating force on a fleeing suspect, with backup in sight.

    But you know they’ll be happy to make a martyr and a scapegoat for their agenda.
    Or perhaps we have an actual problem with the police in this country. Or that. Our police kill people at a rate 70 times that of the average of other civilized nations. We had more police kills in 2 months than England has had in 100 years.

    But yeah, rabble rabble liberals rabble rabble agenda.
    • Reply•Share ›
    Avatar
    Dusty Koellhoffer Ab_Iorwerth • in a few seconds
    I see my blithering idiot stalker is back blathering like a fool who thinks he knows what he’s talking about, especially his childish grammar more closely associated with monkey speak. Go ahead, Ab, be your usual snot-nosed, drunken brat self and try to bait me. A wise man opens a book, a fool opens his mouth. (Now watch and learn how a true deceiver and pathological liar makes loads of personal attacks to attempt inciting an angry response. Nothing will be about the actual subject. It’s all about destroying the credibility of the author in the eyes of the ignorant. He will use mockery and baseless, false pretenses that the average person will not realize are all bogus, like his “correction” of my grammar. He will certainly declare himself to be the speaker of truth and myself to be the idiot, all the while avoiding the subject by throwing out non-factual data, false logic, and personal attacks.)
    • Edit• Reply•Share ›

    Ab_Iorwerth Dusty Koellhoffer • 8 hours ago
    blithering idiot
    Obvious bluster. I think it’s clear I’m both smarter and more informed than you are.

    stalker
    Of course you would be paranoid beyond reason, as well. Of course. Me “stalking” you totally follows from replying to you once every few weeks out of hundreds of my comments and god knows how many of yours.

    blathering like a fool who thinks he knows what he’s talking about
    Nobody believes this bluster.

    especially his childish grammar more closely associated with monkey speak
    You understand that people can actually read my posts, yes? Do you really think this works? You just say that my grammar is bad, and it suddenly becomes so? What a clown you are.

    Go ahead, Ab, be your usual snot-nosed, drunken brat self and try to bait me
    I didn’t “bait” you, I owned you, and the hilarious part is how you don’t realize you’re completely and obviously conceding the argument to me with this bluster.

    A wise man opens a book, a fool opens his mouth.
    What a hilariously useless and banal comment, nevermind the hilarious irony of you being clearly ignorant from a lack of what you could otherwise have been reading.
    • Reply•Share ›

    Dusty Koellhoffer Ab_Iorwerth • a few seconds ago
    Me thinks the lady doth protest too much. Continue with your personal attacks. Makes you feel good to pound your monkey chest, my boy. (I’m sorry, but goading him is just so much fun!)
    • Edit• Reply•Share ›

    Ab_Iorwerth Dusty Koellhoffer • 9 hours ago
    Me thinks the lady doth protest too much
    That doesn’t mean what you seem to think it means.

    Continue with your personal attacks
    What a dishonest little clown of a troll you are.

    Makes you feel good to pound your monkey chest, my boy.
    It really seems to bother you that I’m more intelligent than you are. How sad.
    • Reply•Share ›

    {This is the classic Obama personality type of the sociopathic deceiver and pathological liar. He’s not just the simple fool who believes leftist lies, he is one of the instigators of Alinsky tactics. He will not debate the facts, but use personal attacks in an attempt to elicit an angry response. If he succeeds he will decry you as a mindless bully and play the victim. If he cannot then he will accuse you of being uncaring and ignorant and declare victory. Either way he will not engage in an actual debate of the subject, but work to undermine your credibility. His only purpose is to demean the teacher in the eyes of the student. The intelligent person will look into the facts, but the low-information crowd will be entertained and distracted by his antics. You can choose to ignore him which will play to his advantage as it does in the liberal media demonizing Republicans. I believe the better approach is to turn the tables on him by playing his game and making a mockery of his assertions and then playing him when he plays the victim. When his temper explodes he will be revealed for what he is. Satan is always happy to deceive, but when exposed his evil is revealed to all thru his rage. If done right this is not poking the bear, but tweaking the monkey’s nose. My next play will be to acknowledge his “superior intellect” in a very sarcastic tone.}

    This is the site at which this exchange took place:
    http://www.youngcons.com/south-carolina-police-officers-mom-speaks-out/#comment-1964463320
    4/12
    {I will lay odds of 10:1 he is a narcissistic megalomaniac who will respond in grandiose declaration “confirming” his superior intellect. So reminds me of Obama.}
    4/13
    {and here is comes; either Discus or this site apparently has some liberal who messes with posts as mine were erased after I posted them, but then showed up today. Being an arrogant narcissist, the poor fellow had to reply to all of them, try to belittle me, blame me for everything, including being what he is, cry victim, and then report that I am a blog spammer to have them erased. Too funny!

    I was going to erase these comments as this person’s input is all personal attacks and useless in debating the article, but I decided to leave them because it is an excellent character study of an Alinskyite. Admittedly, I’m not very good at fencing with someone like this who has had years to refine his methods of deception, but his character all comes out clearly. Because Discus erased some of my posts I only have his responses, which is okay because he is such a narcissist he has to copy almost everything I said so he could counter it. I can easily point out his lies and dysfunctional logic at the end, but he talks very well like Obama, so it’s not as clear to the common person.}

    Dusty Koellhoffer Ab_Iorwerth • 16 hours ago
    Oh, I see it now. You’re right! I am in the presence of greatness! I bow down before you and grovel. I am nothing, a nobody – I’m naval lint! Woe, woe is me, I am undone! There is no disputing the wonderment and immensity of your enormous manhood! You are a god among men! All will sing your praises as those who bear witness see that yours is the superior intellect.
    • Edit• Reply•Share ›
    Avatar
    Ab_Iorwerth Dusty Koellhoffer • 12 hours ago
    Oh, I see it now. You’re right!
    I’m not correcting you for you. You’re a moron. You’re the one spamming all these threads with links to what’s probably your own blog. I’m correcting you for all the other people who might read, who should realize you lack credibility, are generally ignorant and bigoted, and are just blogspamming.

    I am in the presence of greatness!
    It’s not “greatness” to be smarter and more informed than some numbnutz on the internet. This is laughable projection of your own ego.

    Woe, woe is me, I am undone! There is no disputing the wonderment and immensity of your enormous manhood! You are a god among men! All will sing your praises as those who bear witness see that yours is the superior intellect.
    Case in point. Thank you.
    • Reply•Share ›
    Avatar
    Dusty Koellhoffer Ab_Iorwerth • a day ago
    This entire exchange is meaningless. I just wanted to throw those out there for fun and watch you dance. 😀
    • Edit• Reply•Share ›
    Avatar
    Ab_Iorwerth Dusty Koellhoffer • 11 hours ago
    This entire exchange is meaningless
    Yes. You can’t become un-clowned.

    I just wanted to throw those out there for fun and watch you dance
    That makes no sense at all. You said stupid things and I pointed out how stupid they were. That’s not “making me dance”.
    • Reply•Share ›
    Avatar
    Dusty Koellhoffer Ab_Iorwerth • a day ago
    This is the classic Obama personality type of the sociopathic deceiver and pathological liar.
    He’s not just the simple fool who believes leftist lies, he is one of the instigators of Alinsky tactics.
    First he will attempt to demean you in the eyes of the observer. He will not debate the facts, but use personal attacks in an attempt to elicit an angry response. If he succeeds he will decry you as a mindless bully and play the victim. If he cannot then he will accuse you of being uncaring and ignorant and declare victory. Either way he will not engage in an actual debate of the subject, but work to undermine your credibility. The intelligent person will look into the facts, but the low-information crowd will be entertained and distracted by his antics.
    • Edit• Reply•Share ›
    Avatar
    Ab_Iorwerth Dusty Koellhoffer • 11 hours ago
    This is the classic Obama personality type of the sociopathic deceiver and pathological liar.
    None of that makes the least bit of logical sense. Nevermind this is coming from a bipolar nut job, in the context of another reply where you’re pretending to just be fooling around.

    He’s not just the simple fool who believes leftist lies, he is one of the instigators of Alinsky tactics.
    Oh god, I can’t wait to share this post. You’re even referring to me in the third person!

    First he will attempt to demean you in the eyes of the observer
    I didn’t “attempt to demean” to, I tackled your ignorance, and I did it by providing counter argument, something that you’re incapable of responding to, because you lack the ability to think critically and address new information.

    He will not debate the facts
    That doesn’t follow from me actually providing facts. This is also, once again, ironic in context, with you not actually providing any yourself.

    use personal attacks in an attempt to elicit an angry response
    I called you a moron because you said stupid things, and I supported why. This is not “personal attacks”.

    If he succeeds
    There’s no if. I succeeded. It’s the only reason you’re blustering on.

    he will decry you as a mindless bully and play the victim
    If I succeed, I’ll play the victim? Do you even read what you write?

    If he cannot then he will accuse you of being uncaring and ignorant and declare victory
    How does that make any sense at all?

    Either way he will not engage in an actual debate of the subject
    Everyone can see you’re describing yourself. You just did all of things you’re incapable of showing me having done.

    * no facts – check

    * personal attacks – check

    * will attempt to demean you – check

    * sociopathic – check

    * deceiver – check

    * play the victim – check

    And the best of all:

    * will not engage in an actual debate of the subject – DING DING DING

    What a joke you are, projecting this much nonsense in about the most obvious way possible.

    the low-information crowd will be entertained and distracted by his antics
    What’s funny is that this is who you think you’re talking to in a general sense, and how you perceive your influence.
    • Reply•Share ›

    {He became so frustrated with trying to shame me that he reported me to Discus in order to have my blog posts banned so my articles would be censored, which is his only purpose that being to keep people ignorant.}

    Visit Ab_Iorwerth’s profile
    Ab_Iorwerth

    Please report the blogspammer. He’s just looking for your clicks on his crappy site.
    3:30 a.m., Monday April 13 | Other comments by Ab_Iorwerth

    Dusty Koellhoffer Ab_Iorwerth • in a few seconds
    What’s really funny is you think other people are actually reading this and you are shaming me into silence and discouraging people from reading the truth, as proven by your trying to have my blog links banned. All I’m doing is tweaking the monkey’s nose. 😉 You’re such a narcissist I’m sure you’ll respond to this, too. This will teach you to stalk conservative sites with your liberal bile!
    • Edit• Reply•Share ›

    {Ok, that was fun! Notice how he strives to turn the blame all back on me. Go back and read his first post. What in it is not a personal attack? What actually addresses the facts presented in the article? He threw out a meaningless factoid about U.S. police shootings vs. other countries, which was a false assumption from the start. He is such a narcissist he must respond to every word I type even to the point of copying them. None of it was about debating the article or facts, but about justifying his personal attacks and then accusing me of making personal attacks and belittling me at every turn.

    This is the kind of arrogant insolence that fills the heart of Obama. Righteous people have come to recognize him as a pathological liar, but many do not understand how he is so successfully duping people and blaming Republicans at the same time. I’m sure there are psychologists who have written about this, but I’ll post my own short article about these negative social tactics as I’ve been the victim of them many times myself, and I’ll try to link to some of the better articles I find.}

    Ab_Iorwerth Dusty Koellhoffer • 5 hours ago
    What’s really funny
    I’m betting this won’t actually be.

    you think other people are actually reading this
    People are always reading these. It’s a public forum. There’s a nice long tail here, too. I’ve gotten responses 2 weeks after I posted a comment.

    Sooooo, that would be not “really funny”, as described.

    and you are shaming me into silence
    I’m certainly shaming you, but there’s no expectation of “into silence”. I’m perfectly aware that you’re too entrenched in your ignorance. You’re just the anvil which my hammer happened to fall on.

    So that’s also not “really funny”. What a shock. 0/2.

    and discouraging people from reading the truth
    You don’t post “truth”, and I’ve never seen you do so. You’re just a crappy blogspammer.

    as proven by your trying to have my blog links banned
    I’m not sure what you mean by “trying to have your blog links banned”. I pointed out your obvious blogspam. That’s it.

    All I’m doing is tweaking the monkey’s nose
    You go ahead and get kicked in the balls over and over and play the “ha ha, just trolling” card. I’m sure that’ll get you far.

    You’re such a narcissist I’m sure you’ll respond to this, too
    Yeah, that’s the only reason I’d reply. God, what a rationalizing coward you are.

    This will teach you to stalk conservative sites with your liberal bile!
    Not a liberal. I’m also not sure what you think smacking you around will teach me. You’re not even unique in your ignorance and trolling.
    • Reply•Share ›

    {If anyone actually takes the time to read this, I would like to hear your opinion. I’ll post his reply which I know is coming.} 😀

    Like

    • dustyk103 says:

      Ab_Iorwerth’s denial of following my posts and attempting to discredit me is an obvious lie from the several “debates” I have had with him. He is obviously a pathological liar of the Obama sort, and there is no argument to be made with this foolish child. Sam Clemens warned of the results of arguing with such people and I do not purpose to oblige him.

      Like

  7. dustyk103 says:

    More from FB:

    Terry Reynolds · Top Commenter · Cameron High School
    Dusty your point is well taken I think everyone knows Democrats never, ever fess up to anything.
    Reply · Like · 19 hours ago

    David Magee · Follow · Top Commenter · Works at Writer
    Koellhoffer, your comment is utterly shameful. You are a thorough disgrace.
    Reply · Like · 13 hours ago

    Like

  8. dustyk103 says:

    FB post;

    Cheryl Adelglass
    Dusty, you presented a great article. I just hope more people read it and actually take the time to ponder the implications.
    Reply · Like · Edited · 18 hours ago

    Dusty Koellhoffer · Top Commenter · University of Georgia · 122 followers
    Thanks, Cheryl. I am, of course, getting lots of grief from those who want to use Officer Slagel as their new poster boy for police murdering blacks, but I won’t let up on them.
    Reply · Like · 18 hours ago

    Trey James · Follow · at Myrtle Beach
    I didn’t bother to read your article but if you can find any justification in what this officer did you’re obviously not a good person and yes the officer should be made the poster boy for shooting unarmed people of any Race. If rouge police officers see someone prosecuted and made an example of they might not be as quick to shoot. Next time. His actions were totally uncalled for period. The mans vehicle wss there he had his ID he could have been found and charged later. This man did not deserve to die. And you said that Black thing right nasty. Spoken like a true Racist and this is cpming from a 55 year old WHITE. Guy that just wants to see an end to all this racism and violence.
    Reply · Like · Follow Post · 14 hours ago

    Dusty Koellhoffer · Top Commenter · University of Georgia · 122 followers
    A wise man opens a book, a fool opens his mouth. Your condemnation of this officer speaks volumes of your own lack of moral understanding.
    Reply · Like · Unfollow Post · 2 seconds ago

    Like

  9. dustyk103 says:

    FB post:

    Dennis Daley · Top Commenter
    Thanks for the open license to fire on all suspects of color, since you have their defense. Luckily, no one will take you as an expert on the subject, and this officer will be charged with murder
    Reply · Like · 2 hours ago

    Dusty Koellhoffer · Top Commenter · University of Georgia · 123 followers
    He may be charged, but at most he will be convicted of manslaughter.
    Reply · Like · 2 hours ago

    Dennis Daley · Top Commenter
    Dusty Koellhoffer Well at least there was a video, or he would have just been coronated another hero…at least there will be some justice this time
    Reply · Like · 2 hours ago

    Dusty Koellhoffer · Top Commenter · University of Georgia · 123 followers
    Not true. He wouldn’t have been able to explain how a suspect ended up with five rounds in his back from range.
    Reply · Like · Unfollow Post · 22 seconds ago

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s