Liberals Backwards Think

backwards thinking

Finding the horse’s ass.  Silly liberals, thinking like kids.

Liberalism – Born of ignorance and bred on immorality

I coined the phrase “liberals backwards think” from observing how liberals employ logic to reach their conclusions (adding the manner in which Yoda of Star Wars speaks his reverse syntax just for fun, not to say they are wise like Yoda, but to illustrate how easily they are confused by their own thought processes).  Liberal logic is what used to be known as “female logic.”  It is a backwards approach that takes a conclusion and uses reverse logic to justify the conclusion rather than using logical progression of the facts to reach a correct conclusion.

This is illustrated magnificently in the following example:

A woman goes shopping and comes home with a new coat exclaiming, “Honey, the store had a 40% off sale on this $100 coat and I saved $40!”  To which the husband responds, “That’s nice, sweetheart, but you spent $60 that we can’t afford.”

Liberal thinking works backwards and concentrates on their flawed conclusion – I saved $40, rather than the actual result, I spent $60.  So the liberal feels good about “saving money” from the purchase while the actual result was an expense.  The same is true about buying on credit; buy now, pay later, but the later isn’t a factor now when the liberal is making the purchase.

Not surprisingly, this is exactly how Democrats in Congress use baseline budgeting.  Instead of announcing they are reducing their increase in spending from 5% to 4%, they say they are reducing spending by 20%.  This fatally flawed system of reporting to the public is why the nation’s debt is always rising and part of the reason why deficit spending has become astronomical.

The massive Obama deficits

The other reason for the deficit is that Democrats, who decried the borrowing done to pay for the Iraq/Afghanistan Wars as “unpaid,” have been using massive quantities of borrowed taxpayer money to prop up Wall Street.  That is why Wall Street is booming while the economy is languishing.  The various “economic stimuli” and “quantitative easing” is spending America’s children into generation debt, making them slaves to government funding.

Liberal logic goes far beyond misrepresenting simple math

Math is not the only thing that liberals approach in a backwards manner.  There are many things that liberals today believe modern day people to be equivalent to people of the past.  There are also moral equivalencies they make that are contrary to righteous morality.  For example;

They equate modern day bankers with money changers in the Hebrew temples during the time of Christ.  They equate successful businessmen of today with the Robber Barons, feudal lords, and pirates of the past.  They equate socialism with Robin Hood, an English Saxon who fought the oppressive taxation of the Norman King John, and believe that stealing from the rich is morally right.

They say they believe taking life is wrong and defend the lives of convicted murderers, yet advocate for taking the lives of babies in the womb.  They defend the rights of criminals and demand the rights of citizens to bear arms be denied because they say guns, not the criminals, are what are dangerous.  They say they are for free speech, unless they disagree with what is said and then want the speech silenced.

Leftist logic is corruption of ethics

The Left will subvert everything righteous in order to justify their beliefs.  They will rewrite history to make villains the heroes and heroes the villains.  Examples are remaking “Sleeping Beauty” as “Maleficent” to reinvent the Evil Queen as the wronged, misguided hero who repents, and deconstructing Jesus the Christ from Savior to recreating Satan as Liberator.

In essence, liberal thinking is immature thinking believing that what sounds good is good regardless of results.  This is what becomes their “Law of Unexpected Consequences,” which is only unexpected to them and not to those who think things through.  It is the foundation of their argument that the results of their policies are not what is to be judged, but only their good intentions.  Unfortunately, the Road to Hell is paved with Good Intentions.

My blog

With that in mind I have been writing articles, first for the online magazine  I turned to my own blog when Examiner decided to terminate our association, and unpublish a thousand articles I had written expressing Christian conservatism and exposing liberal lies.  Much of modern liberalism (which has been taken over by socialists) is based on deception and keeping the ignorant fooled to convince them to voluntarily submit to tyranny.

I approach these articles from the perspective of a Christian conservative with a lifetime of learning morality and politics in the hopes of passing on some wisdom to the young.  America has been deeply corrupted over the last century, and the young are confused as to why the greatest nation in the world is slipping away from them.  I am one of the Guardians of the Republic working to restore the American Dream, and these are my stories.

Stand with the world – license to teach; the authority of my blog

Smear merchants – Democrat media’s propaganda campaign

[Liberalism: Born of ignorance, bred on immorality]

Born to ignorance and immorality, how to overcome liberal’s failures in logic

[Right vs. Left – the true paradigm (revised)]

Right vs. Left – the True Paradigm (original)

Young liberal wisdom: A series of unfortunate beliefs

Related articles;

Climate change deniers vs. Chicken Littles

Morality in humanity – the Right and Left of righteousness

How Obama, Hitler, and the Star Wars Emperor are the same

Christians crushed the Inquisition, Moslems endorse the Jihad

Mohammad: The First Terrorist and his religion of self-imposed brainwashing

Other articles;

The 4D network of liberal debate – deride, distract, deny, demonize

Foreign policy successes on the road to naming Obama Grand Mufti

The Final Solution to Islamic terrorism

Proof of fraud – the Democrat agenda to tax American wealth

Racism – the colossal ignorance of the Left’s language of division

 (Please like, follow, and share this with your friends.  Let them know the truth.)

33 Responses to Liberals Backwards Think

  1. I got this site from my pal who informed me concerning this web page
    and now this time I am browsing this web page and reading very informative content at this place.


  2. When someone writes an article he/she maintains the thought of a user in his/her mind that how a user can understand it. Thus that’s why this article is great.


  3. Rae Alan Yearnd Sr. says:

    The unexamined legacy of Obama is his spending and his debt. This will become a form of blackmail in the future as we will all become slaves to government programs that will be deemed “necessary”
    This is being propped up by the importation of a new underclass of illegal immigrants.


  4. greg says:

    Well done! Keep up the good work, you are being noticed because of it. Thank you.


  5. Matthew says:

    I’d prefer it if they were just called fools. A “liberal” ought to mean someone who sides with liberty, not Islam and other criminality.

    Liked by 1 person

    • dustyk103 says:

      I so absolutely agree with you! The Left’s hijacking of the language and names disgusts me. I’ve written about this;


      • M Simon says:

        And Conservative means conserving error.

        The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of Conservatives is to prevent mistakes from being corrected. Even when the revolutionist might himself repent of his revolution, the traditionalist is already defending it as part of his tradition. Thus we have two great types — the advanced person who rushes us into ruin, and the retrospective person who admires the ruins. He admires them especially by moonlight, not to say moonshine. Each new blunder of the progressive or prig becomes instantly a legend of immemorial antiquity for the snob. This is called the balance, or mutual check, in our Constitution. — G.K. Chesterton

        Nothing has changed since that was written. Drug Prohibition was invented by Progressives. Look who still clings to it. Conservatives.


      • dustyk103 says:

        Very interesting perspective, but it fails to take into account right and wrong, which is the truest measure of ideologies.


  6. Bob Steward says:

    The best comment I can make is to put you in the rare air of Breitbart. Good work. Might think of bringing to light that there is no such thing as a deficit or a national debt for America. It is a fictitious debt created when you have a foreign bank controlling another nations money. Lincoln eliminated with a pen and so can any President who cares not for his or her safety. (All who did were assassinated.) After Lincoln created our own money our nation became the most richest and most powerful nation in the world. Then 1913 created the communist state we have now. I just get irritated when I hear that we have a deficit when every dollar created for our country already has a debt to it for a foreign bank!


    • RalphB says:

      You, sir, are what is known as a “money crank”. Your heart is in the right place in that the Federal Reserve is run by bankers who intend to make a profit rather than by politicians who intend to bankrupt all of us to pay for their desires, and therefore the government does not have direct control over the money but despite appearances, that’s not a “bug” but a “feature”.

      Since we are talking about fiat money here — potentially unlimited numbers of symbols on paper and computer accounts — rather than something concrete, finite, and of objective value, e.g. gold or other commodities — it is (and I know this beggars belief) actually better to hand over the fiat money supply to the banksters who at least have the discipline of marketplace competition and the responsibility to keep stockholders happy as well as statutory oversight of Congress to (supposedly) insure they control inflation and promote full employment. It’s based on the principle of the division of powers.

      If you granted the power to create money directly to congress or the Treasury (i.e. the POTUS) nothing could stop them from (trying to) create unlimited quantities of it and buy themselves and their constituents every thing their yearning hearts desire. That would lead to the complete destruction of the value of fiat currency and hyperinflation that would make the Weimar Repuplic experience look like a picnic. (See:; also Such a policy would wipe out every dollar-denominated store of wealth in the world: demand and savings accounts, CDs, Treasury notes and bonds, mortgages (after hyperinflation borrowers will pay off their mortgages with a week’s wage, you see), and so on.

      The genuine solution to our monetary system would be to require that money be something of objective value, such as gold or other commodities — as it was originally — prohibit fractional reserve banking, and allow those who wish to speculate with their money do so consciously by understanding that if they want a return on their savings they must accept the risks (shared though they may be) of losing principle — as with any investment. Observe the irony of our situation today: We have massive amounts of fractional reserve banking, imposing great risks on depositors (and taxpayers via the FDIC) while the sucker depositors get interest rates that are often negative when you factor in inflation. The Federal Reserve is over a barrel because if they raise rates the government will be unable to pay the interest on the national debt without the exact kind of inflationary policies you are advocating with your Lincoln “greenbacks” endorsement, an eventuality that would destroy the world’s economy and the banks with it, the only other alternative (under the current system) being to default on the debt, which could have the same disastrous result.

      I recommend that you study the Austrian school of economics to understand how money works. You can download numerous free books and resources on Austrian economics (referring to the “school” not the country, of course) at the Mises Institute website. I suggest you start with George Reisman’s “Capitalism: A Treatise on Economics” — free download at:
      For those who wish to get started in understanding economics, the classic introduction is Henry Hazlett’s “Economics in One Lesson” available for purchase here:
      It is also available for free from virtually any school or public library.


  7. Jimbo says:

    Just found this website. Looks interesting. Reminds me of my favorite saying about liberals. I need to have it made into a bumper sticker…….


  8. Jeff says:

    You are a fucking idiot. Leave political commentary to those with FUCKING BRAINS


  9. Sortinghat says:

    Just know that before the end comes good will be bad and bad will be good on a widespread scale.

    Since WW2 this has increased leaps and bounds and the government thinks PC is the aswer.


  10. Sortinghat says:

    So who’s looking forward to their own TSA personal guard to monitor them?


  11. DonT says:

    Just found this interesting blog, and am glad I did. Very informative and written in easy-to-understand language. Cheers.


  12. David Riley says:

    Informative, concise, and extremely erudite… good for you! Excellent site and article! TONS of articles on various topics, issues, etc. Thanks for sharing!


  13. M Simon says:

    Liberals started Drug Prohibition. “Conservatives” still support it. Could some on please explain the difference to me between Conservatives and Liberals? Other than the liberals have given up on Drug Prohibition?

    When Alcohol Prohibition was an issue the Conservatives were the last to give it up. FDR in a landslide.

    And Conservatives are supposed to be so good with history.

    Well we are not so bad off as we were in 1932. Trump 100% supports Medical Cannabis.

    Liked by 1 person

    • dustyk103 says:

      Interesting you should bring this up. I’ve been meaning to write an article about how ridiculous it is that the Democrat anti-drug agenda became the Republican agenda. Democrats started prohibition and elevated the crime rate by trying to legislate morality. They invented all kinds of propaganda like marijuana makes people insane. They called it “loco weed” and said it made people commit mass murders and suicide rather than just becoming a mellow lump. Fifty years later this lie had been repeated so much that people believed it. There’s a great documentary with Woody Harrelson, “Grass,” that exposes it all. I’m still not advocating for it because, as far as I’m concerned, all drugs do is dull your wits, but some people want it for that very reason. For government to try to deny it just causes greater crime.


    • Doug M says:

      Liberals accuse Conservatives of being greedy because they want keep what they earn. But, I suggest Liberals are even greedier because they want to take what others earn.

      Liked by 1 person

  14. Doug M, I agree with you. Liberals preach the message that wealthy people are not paying their fair share in taxes as if it is the gospel truth. For liberals, they think people who want to keep their whole paychecks tax-free are selfish. Personally, I think it is liberals who are selfish. They want to dictate who much money we get to keep. Now, if you doubt what I say, ask your liberal friends, if you have any friends of that political persuasion, if they think you or they should be able to keep every penny you or they earn.


  15. jc says:

    Dustin with all due respect the pictures of Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell wearing Trump shirts are photo shopped. I really wish some real research was done before this stuff runs rampant on the internet. You can find photos of them in the same shirts without the Trump logos. This kind of inaccurate reporting makes us look bad. Sure, we want to see a celebrity support Trump but why should we even care if they do or not? No one should look to a celebrity for affirmation.


    • dustyk103 says:

      I already noted that I know the pic is photoshopped, but used just for the visual to reflect turning sentiments in Hollywood. Actually, the fact that the picture is what helped launch this article to greater readership is worth it in order to spread the truth about Hillary to more people who are in the dark. Kurt and Goldie are just two of many stars who have come out against Hillary. While I agree that I give no credence to any celebrity endorsement because it’s just their opinion and, unfortunately because more actors are liberal fools than not, it’s usually wrong-headed opinions, most people listen to them because they like the characters they play in movies. I’ve had many actors who have ruined my opinion of themselves, but I won’t let them ruin the movies in which they repeat the writer’s words and play the part given to them with conviction. A shame most of them don’t learn from those writers.


  16. Grampa Mullan says:

    Thank you for your service as a first responder. I had a son inlaw who was a paramedic. he loved his work and took it very seriously. I am glad to see another who believes as I do and is in a position to speak up and is unafraid to say what you think At seventy five i am no longer to do much physically but have a pen and a big mouth and am unafraid to use it. I see so many of the hive minded who follow blindly who think they do America service by voting people in like obama because he is black or Hillary because she is a woman. With such logic America is in trouble.


  17. Doug M, liberals are selfish, egotistical, self-centered, lazy, entitlement addicted fools. They claim that people who want to keep every penny they earn are only interested in the well-being of the rich. The Fair Tax allows everyone to keep every penny they earn tax-free. Under the Fair Tax, you pay a tax on new goods and services. Used stuff is not taxed. Basic necessities and purchases up to the poverty level are not taxed.


  18. Smithe3 says:

    Link exchange is nothing else but it is just placing the other persons weblog link on your page at proper place and other person will also do similar in support of you. keckafkfgaedaeea


  19. Doug M, here are a few videos for you: 1:, 2: them and then give me some feedback.


  20. Jim Carter says:

    You have written that “Wall Street is booming while the economy is languishing.” That is because Wall Street is very successful at running a con game.

    The Federal Reserve is a giant Ponzi game that yields humongous profit for select Wall Street financiers (Primary Dealers) that has been stolen from the people. If you found out, you would probably revolt—as has happened in previous societies. All Ponzi schemes are inherently destined for self-destruction and this one is already on the skids.

    “How does the Federal Reserve steal billions daily from the U.S. government ?” you may ask.

    Let me make it simple. The FRBNY has exclusive control of the $8-10 trillion annually received from the auctions of Treasury securities. Ref. 31 CFR 375.3.

    The accounts are client accounts–not operating accounts. There are no reports or audits of the accounts given to Congress or the public.

    The profit of the Fed legally belongs to the government. Concealing and taking what belongs to the government is embezzling. Details below.


    The Federal Reserve system is used by the Wall Street bankers to conceal the theft of $6 billion daily using the FRBNY’s exclusive control of the accounts of auction funds of Treasury securities. They have successfully operated the scheme for 100 years.

    The FRBNY has exclusive control of disbursements of the auction accounts. Ref. 31 CFR 375.3.

    The evidence that the Federal Reserve is diverting the money from the government using the above accounting scam is in plain sight for those who wish to see it:

    ONE: The FRBNY will only establish a line of credit for the government (book entry money) when they receive a Treasury security in the amount of the line of credit.

    TWO: The deficit security is sold as a small percentage on the auctioned roll-over securities. The FRBNY handles all of the accounts and disbursements. Ref. 31 CFR 375.3. The accounts are client accounts (not operational accounts) and have never been audited. Audits of the FR are conducted according to guidelines established by the BOG.

    THREE: Funds from auctioning the deficit security issues (currently $2 trillion annually, $6 billion daily) cannot go to the government. If they did, they would have to buy the securities just issued since no other securities have been purchased. Under those circumstances, there would be no increase in the money in circulation (inflation) nor would there be any increase in the national debt. The money from the auction must go somewhere but it cannot go to the government.

    FOUR: The only feasible destination for the funds is to members of the Primary Dealers who are tasked with collecting called and redeemed Treasury securities. As hidden owners of the corporate Board of Governors (privately owned corporations are not required to file records with the SEC), they can receive deficit spending profit along with funds for the roll-over security work. The owners have put up no consideration for receiving $6 billion daily, even thou it is touted as a loan. (If the non-existing loan was being paid off by the hidden money, it would then result is eliminating any increase in the National Debt. In addition, who, or what,is the source of the putative loan. The Fed does not have it.) (The operation of the BOG readily lends itself to a corporate structure; the FR System does not.)

    FIVE: Profit of the Federal Reserve legally belongs to the government. Hiding money that belongs to the government is a crime. Ref.

    It is assumed the same profitable scam has been set up with the Euro with each nation pledging to guarantee payment on the securities sold by the ECB. The money from the sale of the securities is theorized, based upon the Federal Reserve documented scheme, to go to the controllers/owners of the ECB. Money from the above operations are theorized to fund the New World Order scheme. Ref.

    Is any of this information of interest ?
    Jim Carter


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s