Liberals Backwards Think

George Zimmerman was righteously exonerated of committing any kind of crime in killing Trayvon Martin, yet black leaders, including President Obama and AG Eric Holder, continue to say, “If Zimmerman were on top of Trayvon Martin,” and “He had no right to bring a gun to a fist fight,” and “…could (Trayvon) have stood his ground… (and) been justified in shooting Mr. Zimmerman?”  All of these are lies, distortions, and outright deceptions being perpetrated by Obama and the Left.

Blacks and liberal media lie about Zimmerman

From the start, this tale has been about oppressing whites, calling Zimmerman a “white Hispanic.”  Blacks and our white African-American president say Zimmerman’s story doesn’t fit and has inconsistencies.  Zimmerman’s story has been consistent throughout and has only his wording has changed.  It is the story of those who attempted to make him and not Martin the criminal who changed their stories radically.  This is a common trait of pathological liars and is evident to any honest person who has followed this story and the jury saw through it.

That Trayvon Martin was the attacker and was on top of Zimmerman beating him is an established fact determined by all witnesses and physical evidence that Leftists deny, which is par for the course of Leftist ideologues.  It is not even a possibility that Zimmerman attacked or was on top of Martin.  Believing he could have been is belief in a deceit that is the asylum of immoral fools.

They claim Zimmerman racially profiled Martin.  Yet in the police recording is proof that, too, is a lie.  When asked what the race of the suspicious man was, Zimmerman answered, “He looks black,” because he didn’t know.  He only saw Martin from a distance, obscured by a hoodie in the rain.

As Rachel Jeantel admitted to Piers Morgan, Martin eluded Zimmerman and was almost home when he turned back to give Zimmerman a “whoop ass” because he thought he was gay, a hate crime in itself.  When he surprised Zimmerman as he was walking back to his car, Martin spoke to him.  The words spoken were confirmed by his girlfriend who was listening on her phone and all were as Zimmerman stated.

George Zimmerman did not draw his weapon and shoot Martin because he threatened him.  He did not draw his weapon as Martin approached, contrary to concealed weapons training not to let an attacker get close.  He did not draw his weapon and shoot when Martin’s intent became apparent.   He did not draw his weapon and shoot after being punched in the nose.  He did not draw his weapon and shoot while being pummeled on the ground.  He only drew and shot Martin when his attacker went for his gun.

Zimmerman didn’t bring a gun to a fist fight, but Martin, the attacker, was more than willing to take the gun on his victim and probably would have used it.  No one starts out life as a murderer, but Trayvon Martin, already suspended from school for criminal acts, attacking a stranger because he thought he was gay, was well on his way to becoming one in that moment.  That Martin was already a burglar at seventeen and leading a life of crime is also an established fact.  Part of the corruption of the justice system is that criminal rights forbid bringing up the past of criminals when they stand trial.

A jury rightly found George Zimmerman innocent of any crime in killing Trayvon Martin.  Now a far worse crime is being committed.  Blacks are rioting on the streets and innocent people have been beaten and murdered in the name of “Justice for Trayvon” who got the justice he deserved.  The crime is revenge and persecution and President Obama is the instigator.

In his statement on Friday, July 19, Obama gave lip service to sympathy and peace, and then went on to denounce Zimmerman for daring to defend himself.  He denounced the laws that allow citizens to protect themselves with lethal force against criminals who have become more violent and rampant in the last fifty years thanks to Democrat policies.  Obama excused black violence and called for law-abiding citizens to be disarmed so ‘such “tragedies” would not happen again, that black families need fear for their children from white people.’

The tragedy here is that Obama, as the first black president, did not speak out against black criminals and the violence inherent in black culture, but justified it.  Obama didn’t say black criminals need to disarm, but calls for citizens protecting themselves to be disarmed.  President Obama committed a crime against all of humanity in condemning the righteous while exonerating the wicked.  Obama is not a servant of justice, but a perpetrator of revenge.

This case is not about blacks being oppressed by whites, but of white people being oppressed by blacks.  Blacks make up 12% of the population and account for more than 70% of the violent crime in America.  It is not blacks who should be outraged by this verdict, it is whites who should be outraged by this injustice.  Obama took the oath of office to uphold the Constitution, but instead seeks to subvert it.  He behaves every bit as deceptive and malicious as the ‘Sith Lord’ in “Star Wars.”

O.J. Simpson was found not guilty by a jury of blacks to spite whites for past oppression, despite a mountain of evidence proving he murdered two white people.  Did the government and white people persecute him, have riots, and murder innocent blacks over the verdict?  Since Obama is more concerned about the 6% of blacks killed by white, Hispanics, and Asians than about the 94% murdered by members of their own race, police should be moved from the high crime black neighborhoods to ‘protect black children from wicked white people.’

President Obama finally made comments regarding George Zimmerman being exonerated of any crime in killing Trayvon Martin.  Having watched as blacks rioted and committed murders and assaults around the country in the name of “Justice for Trayvon,” he came out in a news conference today and fanned the flames while giving lip service to peaceful protests.  Saying that the trial outcome would have been very different had their situations been reversed, Obama contemplated, if Trayvon had a gun would he have been held innocent for standing his ground?

Obama talks about death of Trayvon

“And for those who resist that idea that we should think about something like these “stand your ground” laws, I’d just ask people to consider, if Trayvon Martin was of age and armed, could he have stood his ground on that sidewalk? And do we actually think that he would have been justified in shooting Mr. Zimmerman who had followed him in a car because he felt threatened? And if the answer to that question is at least ambiguous, then it seems to me that we might want to examine those kinds of laws.”

The answer, Mr. President, is no.  You cannot shoot someone just because you feel threatened.  Stand your ground says you do not have to retreat if you feel threatened which is what was required in previous self-defense laws.  But George Zimmerman did not feel threatened when he shot Trayvon Martin.  He was being viciously assaulted and beaten potentially to death and was unable to retreat.

President Obama believing that Trayvon was on the bottom of that fight is the deception being perpetrated on the people.  All the evidence, that an eye witness saw the man with the hoodie on top, that Zimmerman’s head was bashed and not Martin’s, and by the admission of Martin’s girlfriend, Rachel Jeantel, that he attacked Zimmerman to give him a “whoop ass.”  There is no reasonable doubt as to who was on top, no possibility of ‘if it were Zimmerman.  To believe this is to deny facts, deny reality, and deny truth.  Such denial is the pathological mental defect of criminal minds who would deny seeing themselves on video and is nothing less than a God-damned lie!

The Great Divider has made his stand and ambiguously made remarks about black culture and how blacks are looked on with suspicion, barely referring to the fact that black men commit a hundred times more crime than any other demographic group.  He made the usual Democrat pledge that the nation must look into ways to make life better for young black men.  Yet it is and has always been Democrat policies that make life for blacks in America terrible.

How about making prison so terrible that they will be afraid to commit crimes rather than eager to do so without fear of the consequences?  That worked great until the criminal justice system was corrupted over the last fifty years to be more concerned for criminal rights than for those of their past and future victims.  How about telling them not to take up crime in the first place?

NAACP leaders are saying it is racist to believe black men are criminals and guilty until proven innocent, yet the Zimmerman family and the jurors and defense team on his case are all in hiding and/or carrying guns to protect themselves from them.  All of them have received multiple death threats from the black community who demand “Justice for Trayvon.”  Across the country, innocent people have been beaten and murdered by black men.  What is racist about calling rioters and murderers criminals?

MSNBC guest says ‘Stand your ground laws’ “humiliating to blacks”

Despite the ‘Stand Your Ground’ law not being a part of this case, Attorney General Eric Holder said that this law “senselessly expands the concept of self-defense and sows dangerous conflict in our neighborhoods.”  He also said that, “These laws try to fix something that was never broken.  There has always been a legal defense for using deadly force if, and the ‘if’ is important, if no safe retreat is available.”

Eric Holder attempting to charge Zimmerman with racism

Concealed weapon, Castle, and Stand Your Ground Laws have all been put into effect in conservative states to give citizens protections from being prosecuted by the law when they defend themselves from criminals.  Prior to these laws, citizens who defended themselves with lethal force were prosecuted by the state as criminals.  This situation has become intolerable to citizens who were expected to allow criminals to destroy them and leave government law enforcement to clean up the mess.

Crime has become rampant in the last fifty years.  Blacks are crying about Trayvon Martin who was killed was committing a felony crime against George Zimmerman that could have killed or maimed him.  Blacks say they are not criminals to be profiled, yet 11,000 blacks have been murdered, 94% of them by other blacks, with illegal guns in the year since Zimmerman shot Martin, and none of them are crying about that.  Blacks make up 12% of the population and account for 75% of the violent crime.

This is not about white men being racists.  This is not about black children being gunned down on the streets.  This is about the rights of white men to defend themselves against criminals, most of whom happen to be black.

This is about black criminals objecting to citizens being able to defend themselves.  This is about corrupted black culture and their leaders who want to gin up race hatred rather than help blacks get ahead in America.  This is what you get with Democrats who enslaved blacks contrary to Republicans who freed them.

Liberals, both black and white, continue to try to push their narrative that “little Trayvon” was hunted down and murdered despite the acquittal of George Zimmerman.  Testimony in the case revealed that the teen, who was bigger than Zimmerman, was the aggressor.  Trayvon’s girl friend, Rachel Jeantel, stated that Trayvon did elude Zimmerman and go home and then turned to go back and attack him.

Taking this case point by point made by the Left and the Right reveals the truth.

• The Left claims that Zimmerman initiated the conflict by “stalking” Martin as he was walking home and getting out of his car to follow him.
• The Right says that Zimmerman, as any citizen, has a right to observe anyone acting suspiciously and that Martin initiated the conflict by entering his neighborhood and, instead of walking straight through to get home out of the rain, was wandering about and looking through windows apparently casing out homes.
• The Left claims that Zimmerman is a racist who decided Martin was a criminal because he was a black man wearing a hoodie.
• The Right says that even the FBI’s extensive investigation has revealed no racism on the part of Zimmerman and have proven that liberal media deliberately committed fraud in editing their tapes to make Zimmerman appear to be racist.
• The Left claims that Zimmerman “profiled” Martin and that is racist.
• The Right says that profiling is a tool of law enforcement and racism has nothing to do with it.  That young black men are one hundred times more likely to engage in criminal activity than any similar demographic group is a fact and law enforcement has a right to profile.
• The Left claims Zimmerman confronted Martin.
• The Right says the police recordings and witness’s testimony prove otherwise.
• The Left claims that Zimmerman was on top of Martin beating him.
• The Right says the only eye witnesses said it was Martin on top and Zimmerman.
• The Left claims that Martin was screaming for help based on his mother’s testimony.
• The Right says that all other witnesses identified the voice as Zimmerman’s who is screaming for help.
• The Left claims Trayvon was engaging in “whoop ass” to beat down Zimmerman and that Zimmerman brought a gun to a fist fight.
• The Right says that Trayvon was not engaging in ‘fisticuffs’ but was bashing Zimmerman’s head on the concrete sidewalk potentially killing him or causing serious brain injuries.
• The Left claims Zimmerman lied.
• The Right says that witness testimony, even prosecution witnesses, proved Zimmerman’s case for self-defense.

Both men had an opportunity to avoid this conflict.  The ‘Stand Your Ground Law’ says that a person is not required to retreat when attacked, but George Zimmerman did not use that law in his defense, but simply used the self-defense law.  Self-defense requires that a person’s first action in a conflict is to retreat and call police.  Zimmerman, having been eluded by Martin, was retreating back to his car and had already called police.  This is confirmed in the police recording of his non-emergency call for police to come out and investigate the suspicious man he was following.  After Martin’s attack began he was unable to retreat.

Rachel Jeantel revealed in her interview with Piers Morgan what she did not admit to in court, that Martin had also retreated and almost gotten home, but then he circled back and ambushed Zimmerman.  She said Martin called Zimmerman a “creepy ass cracka” which means that he thought he was a police or security guard.  She said that she thought he might be a homosexual rapist and told Trayvon to run from him.  But after getting home, Martin did not call the police.  Instead, he circled back to ambush and attack Zimmerman.

Police instructed Zimmerman not to confront Martin, which he did not.  Black leaders are now claiming he should have confronted him and perhaps he could have explained why he was following him and nothing would have happened.  This flies directly in the face of police instructions to not confront.  When Martin confronted Zimmerman, he immediately punched him in the face and beat him to the ground.

Blacks claim they do not call police because they would be the ones taken away.  This is not 1950 Mississippi where the black man is always wrong, but 21^st century America where a black man can become President of the United States.  It stands to reason that Martin could have called the police and told them he thought he was being followed by a gay sexual predator and nothing would have come of the incident once motives were revealed.  But criminals do not call police and Trayvon Martin already had a record, actually being in Sanford because he had been suspended from his Miami school for burglary.

Trayvon Martin was not a little black boy eating his Skittles who was hunted down by a white Hispanic racist.  He was a young man who attacked another man.  Anyone in George Zimmerman’s situation would have believed they were going to be killed and defended themselves if they were able.

Martin had no right to attack and beat Zimmerman.  If he had the gun and shot Zimmerman, he would have been guilty of murder.  The law permits you to defend yourself, not to assault someone because you think he might be a gay rapist.

People do not start out in life as murderers, but Trayvon Martin was on his way to committing his first and was stopped.  And for that, blacks claim they want “justice for Trayvon.”  Justice is what Trayvon got.  What they really want is revenge.

Since promising that his administration would bring an end to racial strife, America is more divided along racial lines than ever.  Now that George Zimmerman has been found not guilty of any crime in killing Trayvon Martin while defending himself, blacks are rioting, murdering innocent people, making death threats against his family, and demanding Obama destroy him.  The NAACP called on President Obama to retry the case under federal civil rights laws despite the FBI making an exhaustive investigation concluding there was no racism involved.

Sharpton calls for persecution of Zimmerman via civil rights charges

Despite the FBI report, Attorney General Eric Holder, already held in Contempt of Congress and responsible for gun running to Mexican drug dealers, has said he will seek to prosecute Zimmerman under federal law.

AG Holder is investigating filing federal charges against Zimmerman

George Zimmerman is one of few citizens who are willing to look after his fellow citizens on neighborhood crime watch and inform police of suspicious persons.  When the suspicious person he reported circled back, attacked him, and attempted to beat him to death by slamming his head on the sidewalk, he shot him dead, legally.  From the start, prosecutors withheld evidence and pushed forward a case for which there is no evidence to indicate murder or manslaughter and the liberal media manufactured the charge of racism through fraudulent reporting.

Dershowitz: “Zimmerman prosecutors should be disbarred”

Ann Coulter condemns media coverage

Gun violence drastically less thanks to concealed carry laws

Americans are safer because of concealed carry laws and the mobsters don’t like it.  But they elected Obama and he appointed Holder to promote their culture to be thieves and murderers.  All of the black leaders who are promoting revenge are those who are invested in keeping black America engrossed in a culture of crime and corruption.  Democrats have been lifted by the corrupt and criminal since the beginning of the country.  They have sought to disarm citizens since they gained power and created the Federal Reserve.

“Democrats are what happens when criminals become politicians.” – Dustin Koellhoffer

This entire fiasco has been a fraud from the start, beginning with the liberal media creating the fiction that Martin was a little black child stalked and murdered by a white man.  All of this is part of the Obama Agenda to say guns are too dangerous in the hands of citizens and need to be taken away as part of a “reasonable” precaution.  Once disarmed, citizens will be at the mercy of the government and any tyranny they choose to impose, a warning of which Obama tells young people to not listen.

Blacks in America are up in arms over the verdict declaring George Zimmerman innocent of committing a crime in killing Travyon Martin.  On O’Reilly, Tavis Smiley said we need more gun control to get the guns off the streets.  O’Reilly replied that gun control will not solve the problem because criminals get guns illegally.  O’Reilly said, “I could solve the problem by federalizing gun crimes but you wouldn’t back that because you’d say the sentencing was unfair when the guy with the gun is one of yours.”

Smiley responded,

“I could solve the problem, too.  Arm every black person in America and then see what the NRA would have to say.”

This statement is proof that intelligence has its limits but stupidity knows no bounds.  The NRA supports concealed weapon laws to have all law-abiding citizens to be armed to protect themselves from criminals.  Smiley says arm every black person?  Every black person is already armed, illegally, and committing murder.  75% of murderers are committed by blacks in a country where they make up 12% of the population.

The problem is black culture.  Blacks teach their children that being a thug is cool, being a gangsta is manly, attacking crackers is right.  They do this because their culture teaches hate, racism, and criminal behavior.

On Twitter, the hatred and unrighteousness of the Left was made evident by their calls for attacking innocent people.

Twitter reactions to verdict as Left denounces justice and vows revenge

Entertainers and athletes endorsed more race hatred

Celebrities twitter race hatred

The entire narrative of the Left has been a fraud portraying Martin as an innocent child being hunted down by a white man, when the truth is he was a young thug and thief who thought he could attack a man for following him while he was apparently scoping out houses to burglarize.

Trayvon already met justice

True to the nature of the Left, they murder innocent people

Blacks murder innocent white man for Trayvon

On Bill O’Reilly, Rev. DeGraff said the system needs to be changed because there is a disparity between the way blacks and whites are treated.  Bill said that’s because blacks commit more crime and are more violent.  To which DeGraff responded,

“I’m saying that black’s represent a trillion dollar economy in this country.  We have the muscle to change this situation.  I want to change the law.  It’s been open season on young black men in this country by the criminal justice system.”

O’Reilly corrected him pointing out that most black men are killed by other black men.  Statistics show that 91% of blacks killed in the last year were by other blacks and that twice as many blacks murder whites as whites kill blacks.  DeGraff went on to say there is disparity in sentencing, in education, and in industry (jobs).

None of this in 21^st century America is due to white oppression.  This is 100% due to black culture.  Since being given their freedom, blacks have had two paths to choose to follow just as all people do; learn a trade or be a thief.

Democrats are, and have always been, the bane of African descendants in America from the time they brought them over as slaves, to fighting against their freedom, to the oppression of their civil rights, to making them voter slaves.  Since Jackson and Sharpton stood on either side of Martin Luther King, Jr. while he was shot, they tell them white people owe them.  King fought for equality and the rights to prosper by their own effort as all Republicans do.  Democrats Jackson and Sharpton maintain their own kingdom by telling their serfs to demand government steal for them and riot when they do not.

Would you like conservatives stop objecting to abortion and side with liberal Democrats and encourage them to kill their children in the womb?  How about we remove police from the inner cities and let the gangs of black kids kill each other by the tens of thousands?

Democrats are invested in chaotic black culture.  Liberals idolize thugs and glorify gangsters for acquiring power, drugs, bitches, and wealth by theft and force.  Only 5% of blacks adhere to Christian conservatism while 95% support this culture.  Islam is the largest growing religion amongst young black men fourteen to forty, the same demographic group that is 100 times more likely to be criminals because it promotes their culture.

Does that sound racist to you?  You Leftist hypocrite!  You are the one encouraging their behavior rather than demanding they behave righteously as conservatives do!

Blacks lack in education because their kids are encouraged to play basketball rather than do their homework, to deal drugs rather than get a job, to engage in licentious behavior rather than build a family and act responsibly.  You should be telling them to go to church and find Christ, go to school and learn, go to work and earn a living.  Instead you make certain they do not prosper and then tell them it is whitey’s fault.  You call the Tea Party the KKK and act as if this nation were 1955 Mississippi.

Congressman Col. Allen West quoted what Booker T. Washington said in 1911,

“There is a class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the negro race before the public.  Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs, partly because they want their sympathy, and partly because it pays.  Some of these people do not want the negro to lose his grievances because they do not want to lose their jobs.”