Ignorance is bliss, but only to a liberal for whom it is the foundation of their ideology. A little knowledge for a liberal is a dangerous thing. Liberals believe science must deny God and that those who believe in God deny science. Yet liberals believe more in science fantasy than science fact.
Take Skepticalscience.com whose author purports to “disprove” the beliefs of “science deniers” of climate change. I didn’t have to go past the first item on his list to know he is preying on the ignorance of his audience to push home his agenda (the huge CO2 increase in the geological record occurs after Ice Ages began when vegetation was frozen out and it took algae blooms in the ocean years to replace them, not before to cause them – and mankind’s cars were certainly not around then). I have written extensively about the liberal socialist climate change agenda to propagandize ignorant fools, promoting Chicken Little predictions of how man is going to end the world if we allow Americans to continue to use fossil fuels, the very energy that has made America, along with her Constitution, the most prosperous nation in the world.
I have better things on which to waste my time than taking his extensive and ridiculous arguments apart. You’ll just have to do some research for yourself. This video is a good starting point.
Liberals claim to have debunked it, but their debunking, like their political assassinations, is about attacking the character of the producers, and refuting the facts with “modern” facts that are all skewed by scientific organizations that serve liberal administrations. What facts they refute, like Skepticalscience.com, relies on people’s ignorance of science and their ignorance that scientists have been exposed as political animals. It does not explain that NOAA, like NASA, has become Obama’s outreach to both Muslims and socialists, and that government muscle can force honest scientists to deny they proved that global warming science is a scam.
What the debunkers won’t admit is that there has been no warming for the last fifteen plus years proving their hockey stick CO2 graph to be completely false. Despite their claims that July 2015 was the warmest month on record (by a hundredth of a degree), the falsification of data from government funded scientists exposed by hacking their emails renders such data worthless. Ask why is the North Pole ice increasing instead of disappearing as they claimed it would?
This answer is in knowing that liberal’s solution to climate change, be it warming, cooling, storms, or CO2, is always the same – American must adopt socialism:
- government leaders must steal all the wealth to dole it out to their friends
- people must be forced to stop using fossil fuels for their cars
- they must stop using their air conditioners and heaters to save electricity
- they must stop using coal generated electricity (hence no a/c or heat)
- they must stop nuclear power (it’s so dangerous)
- they must stop using jet-powered air travel
Meanwhile, China and India, which are now producing more CO2 than America and Europe ever did, are freed by treaty with the US and EU to increase their pollution and use more coal and oil than America and Europe possibly could. The liberal agenda is sheer insanity that will weaken America and expand the power of the worst regimes on the planet. Socialists; Communists, Nazis, and Fascist regimes are expanding, including the ultimate Socialist-Nazi ideology of Islam. What young liberals are being taught will make the world a better place and save the planet from “the virus of mankind” is nothing more than the Left’s agenda to destroy Christian America and make the worst people in the world powerful.
Liberals are like vegans who refuse to eat catfish because they’re “bottom feeders,” (i.e. they eat sh*t). These ignorant people obviously don’t know what farmers use to fertilize their vegetables. Liberals believe science has proven that God doesn’t exist, that evolution is a fact, and that the Universe is random chaos out of which mankind accidentally formed.
Liberalism vs. conservatism is a contest over science, faith, and existence. They believe they are the side of right in a battle between science and science fiction or fantasy, when they are actually on the side of the Left (i.e. the wrong side). Imagination is a good thing. It gives us creativity and inventiveness. It causes us to experiment to find the truth. But liberalism is not about finding the truth, it’s about affirming their own immature beliefs.
There are many oxymorons in liberalism; the noble savage, liberal wisdom, and man as God. A quickie look at what liberal’s believe about science and religion can enlighten some. Let’s examine this in the simplest of layman’s terms;
Darwin is credited by liberals with proving evolution when, in fact, he only proved survival of the fittest. The Theory of Evolution was developed by other scientists but it remains a theory because there are so many large, gaping holes in the proofs. Yet liberals believe the Universe, life, and mankind all formed by random chance.
Quantum physics led to the discovery of the atom, quarks, and eventually to String Theory, which is essentially a theory that energy strands resonate throughout the universe forming all matter. This could as easily be rendered as God Theory. (No doubt some liberal scientist will come here and tell me that I’m all wrong, but let’s keep it simple, stupid.) It’s a theory because it cannot be proven through science.
How much else does science not know? The fact is, science has only blossomed in the last few hundred years, and has mushroomed in the amazing 20th century along with everything else. Like those who believe they can predict global climate in one hundred years based on the last century’s weather patterns, believing we know the answers is the pinnacle of human hubris.
Take Quantum Mechanics which is the study of the Universe. Until a couple hundred years ago we knew about stars, six planets, the Sun and the Moon, and the Milky Way. Until mathematicians figured out that the Sun doesn’t revolve around the Earth, mankind was the center of the Universe.
With Hubble we can see we are in a galaxy in a cluster of galaxies and that there are millions of clusters billions of light years away. A couple of decades ago we discovered the Universe was a couple billion lights years in diameter. Then it became ten billion, now it’s twenty-eight billion, and the funny thing is, we are still at the center of that mass.
The point is that science is not all-knowing, it’s experimental and still in the learning stage. But our own imaginations let us run wild at times. Take our entertainment industry;
Star Trek characters use teleportation to speed up activity between the ship and the planets, yet scientists tell us that the human body would have to be heated to a billion degrees to accomplish the separation of molecules. How about X-Men wherein the next step in “evolution” is for human beings to develop fantastical powers? Very entertaining, but purely fantasy.
The move, Lucy, is a great example of science meets science fiction and how man can become God. The movie is based on scientist’s understanding that humans only use 10% of their brains. Now I ask you, which is more likely; we don’t use 90% of our enormous brains that have developed in nature (or by God’s design) or that scientists have not yet figured out what how it is being used? Remember how big the Universe has gotten in the last few decades? The fact is that if Dolphins, that use 20% of their brains as scientists understand it, could do what Lucy could do when she hit 20% then they would rule the planet.
God may be fiction to liberals who want to believe in their own magnificence, but the science in which they believe is equally fictitious. Ask a liberal why all organic life must consume organic life to survive and perpetuate? Ask him how the Universe began? Scientists can prove it was the Big Bang, but what caused it?
Likewise, scientists have a theory but no proof of how life began, about what caused the creation of organic matter that would combine into the amazing complex creatures we know as homo sapiens. For that matter, they don’t know why mankind developed so far in advance of all other living creatures. The only answers are; God created the Universe, God created Life, and God separated Man from the animals.
There will always be those things in the Universe that mankind cannot explain. It can’t even be known if there is a God in this material universe, yet who says God exists within this universe or within one that we would believe to be a spiritual realm? It is said that Satan deceived Eve to eat of the Apple, but liberals don’t even understand that story.
Liberals get lost when taught “old knowledge.” It takes many years to understand how the world works, and while ignorance may be bliss, what you don’t know can kill you. Understanding the difference between old adages and liberal interpretations is key to understanding life. For instance;
“Money is the root of all Evil,” is a liberal axiom, which is why they damn all rich people as evil. The actual saying from the Bible, “The love of money is the root of all evil,” refers to greed, something in which liberalism abounds. In rejecting the Bible, liberals leave themselves in ignorance of a great many things.
The apple of which Adam and Eve partook was not from “The Tree of Knowledge,” but from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. Satan gave it to them telling them that eating this would “make them as God.” The ultimate deception said to have been done today is that Satan convinced the world that he does not exist.
That, and liberal belief that Original Sin is sex, convinces those who believe they are divinely created by God that those who believe they are descended from monkeys make a good point. If you don’t believe men have souls, and you’re thinking is so confined that you don’t understand that women are part of mankind in that statement, it is easy to see why it is so important to prove your desire that you have the power of God. The fact is, if all a person has is this existence on Earth in this material universe, and not a spiritual life that comes after, what hope is there of a greater existence to keep one from behaving like an animal?
If science does not walk hand-in-hand with faith, where can it possibly hope to lead us except to our own extinguishment? A God who loves us, but who wishes us to be loving beings, would not banish us to an eternal torture chamber, as those who don’t understand that the torture of Hell is not having pain inflicted for eternity, but being eternally separated from God. God sends no one to Hell, but leaves the choice to them to either love only themselves as greedy animals, or to love God and others above themselves. God does not allow bad things to happen on Earth, but gives us the freedom to choose, and as the Internet parable about light, and heat, and God demonstrates, those who choose to live without God cannot anymore be expected to act godly than they can be expected to understand anything beyond their ken.
An old adage, as one of those “obsolete old things” conservatives believe, tells us; “You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink,” which means, you can tell a liberal the truth, but you can’t make him think.
If you’re so concerned about global warming then turn on your air conditioner and open the windows to help cool the planet. Alternatively, you can do your part to stop producing CO2 and quit breathing. One way or another maybe you’ll get a clue.
As was pointed out to me in comments, I used incorrect terminology referring to the science of the macro-verse and micro-verse. I was taught back in college that Hawking’s “Theory of Everything” was his endeavor to reconcile the science of the universe and atoms because the two do not follow all the same physical laws. This instructor taught me that the universe was referred to as Quantum Mechanics and the micro-verse was Quantum Physics. The correct terms would be Cosmology and Physics, but even that is more simplified than Hawking’s theory.
However, liberals are never happy when their politics are exposed and, as they have no defense against the science that proves liberal’s claim that global warming being caused by man, that the climate can be controlled by CO2 pollution limitations, they always resort to the standard Liar’s Plan B: When you are exposed as a liar accuse the other person of being a liar.
When the facts are not on the side of a liberal then they will denounce those speaking the truth as not knowing the truth, glomming onto any error they make and declaring that if they make one mistake then everything they say is wrong. That’s the kind of dogma that makes the advocacy of climate change alarmism a religion rather than science. They always go for character assassination rather than factual proof to discredit the facts by association.
Being wrong is like being a sinner. No matter how good anyone believes themselves to be, everybody sins, and everybody makes mistakes. I was mistaken in scientific terminology regarding the macro-verse and micro-verse, but one error in terminology does not nullify the science that proves climate change to be a natural occurrence over which mankind has little to no influence and even less control. When the “scientific” solution to climate change is that only the United States reduce its energy use and change the government to a socialist totalitarian abomination, it becomes obvious that this movement has nothing to do with science but everything to do with politics and religion.
(Please like and share this with your friends. Let them know the truth. To subscribe click on “follow” and respond to the email WordPress sends you.)
(Debate: Honest people wishing to debate will post their remarks in the comments of the article. Dishonest people wishing to dissuade people from reading the truth will post in the comments of a link.)