Bush damns Obama’s weakness vs. ISIS

Bush mission accomplished

Democrats wouldn’t give President Bush and America’s soldiers credit for taking down Saddam Hussein.  Instead, they condemn them for fighting an “unnecessary war” and stirring up a hornet’s nest.  W finally came out to denounce Obama’s weakness in the face of the Jihad that has been waged against the world for centuries.

Unlike Democrat presidents who waste no opportunity to condemn their Republican counterparts, Republican presidents don’t speak out against the policy decisions of Democrats.  But the foul policies of Barack Hussein Obama, policies that are easily labelled as treasonous to America, are being called to account by President Bush.  With Christians in the Middle East being slaughtered by the thousands, churches burned and denied the right to rebuild, and even refugees being thrown overboard by Moslems fleeing the carnage, Obama denies them the simple justice of recognizing their plight.

Making excuses that the persecution is not Islamic, (quite contrary to the teachings of Mohammad and fourteen centuries of Islamic oppression inflicted on the Middle East, Europe, and Asia) Obama will not name the murderers motivations, nor will he acknowledge that it is Christians they are singling out for murder.  Instead he equivocates over Moslems being killed by ISIS because they will not join the Jihad as instructed by Mohammad.

Bush calls out Obama – a line has been crossed

From its inception, Islam has never been a religion of peace, but a religion of oppression.  The name Islam itself means submission, and its adherents are fanaticized through their system of prayer and obedience to their theocracy.  Most of those enslaved by Islam live in fear of Jihadis or they would gladly turn to Christianity and the Redeemer Christ.

Despite leftist propaganda that Christians are wicked based on events in history when leftists corrupted and took control of the Church, no other belief offers what Jesus does.  Those who have found that salvation will not give it up despite the threat of death.  What the West will not face is that this evil religion is now infiltrating their countries as leftists suppress Christian teachings.

Related articles;

The troops know which president loves them and they love him back

Other articles;

Climate change deniers vs. Chicken Littles

Foreign policy successes on the road to naming Obama Grand Mufti

The Final Solution to Islamic terrorism

Proof of fraud – the Democrat agenda to tax American wealth

Racism – the colossal ignorance of the Left’s language of division

(Please like and share this with your friends.  Let them know the truth.  To subscribe click on “follow” and respond to the email WordPress sends you.)

About dustyk103

This site is my opinion only and is unpaid. I am a retired Paramedic/Firefighter with 25 years of service in the City of Dallas Fire Dept. I have a B.A. degree in Journalism, and A.A. degrees in Military Science and History. I have spent my life studying military history, world history, American history, science, current events, and politics making me a qualified PhD, Senior Fellow of the Limbaugh Institute, and tenured Professor Emeritus for Advanced Conservative Studies. 😄 It is my hope that readers can gain some knowledge and wisdom from my articles.
This entry was posted in Election 2016, Islamism, Obama's legacy, Religion and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Bush damns Obama’s weakness vs. ISIS

  1. dustyk103 says:

    From FB:


    Humphrey Chimpden Earwicker Dusty Koellhoffer • 3 hours ago
    Maybe Bush shouldn’t have lied to get us over there in the first place. Saddam would have taken care of ISIS for us without our even knowing about them.
    • Reply•Share ›
    Phil Snyder Humphrey Chimpden Earwicker • 3 hours ago
    Perhaps the Clintons (Bill and Hillary) should not have lied about Iraq either.
    Perhaps Kerry should not have lied about Iraq nor Pelosi nor France nor Germany.
    Perhaps Saddam should not have built and used poisonous gas weapons.

    EVERYONE believed that Iraq had WMD and the WMD had been cataloged and inventoried, but after Saddam shut out the UN inspectors, no one knows what happened to his WMD that we KNEW he had.

    So, please stop the MSNBC BS and grow up.
    8 • Reply•Share ›
    Humphrey Chimpden Earwicker Phil Snyder • 18 minutes ago
    Maybe the sheep who lap up everything the right-wing media said, “believed that Iraq had WMD,” and maybe the politicians who never thought the president would lie to start a war believed it, but I and thousands of other citizens never believed it, and we made our opinion known through some of the largest peacetime demonstrations in U.S. history.

    Just because you were an ignorant fool, doesn’t mean “everyone” was. And yes, I’m disgusted with Hillary for falling for Bush’s lies.
    • Reply•Share ›
    p salinas Phil Snyder • 2 hours ago
    Ditto !
    • Reply•Share ›
    Cherry Bành Humphrey Chimpden Earwicker • an hour ago
    It was Clinton Intell that told Bush about WMD..

    We begin with
    the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the
    peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the
    United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e
    means of delivering them.”

    Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

    “We know that he has
    stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout
    his country.”

    Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

    “Iraq’s search
    for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we
    should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.”

    Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

    “We have known for
    many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of
    mass destruction.”

    Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

    “The last UN
    weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that
    Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological
    weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up
    his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports
    indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons…”

    Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

    “I will be
    voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use
    force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe
    that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a
    real and grave threat to our security.”

    Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

    “There is
    unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to
    develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the
    next five years … We also should remember we have always
    underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons
    of mass destruction.”

    Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

    “He has
    systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every
    significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy
    his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he
    has refused to do”

    Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

    “In the four
    years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam
    Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons
    stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has
    also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al
    Qaeda members … It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam
    Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and
    chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.”

    Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

    “We are in
    possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam
    Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity
    for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.”

    Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

    question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous
    dictator, leading an oppressive regime … He presents a particularly
    grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation
    … And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued
    deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction … So
    the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is

    Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
    • Reply•Share ›
    Humphrey Chimpden Earwicker Cherry Bành • 15 minutes ago
    Even if true, it still didn’t justify a pre-emptive war. Now you can’t complain if the U.S. is attacked because we have our own WMD that someone feels threatened by. Saddam was well contained and only harming his own people – and if you think he should have been overthrown because he was a dictator, then we should be declaring war on half the countries in the world.
    • Reply•Share ›
    TJB Cherry Bành • an hour ago
    Nice post. Why does everyone forget that he USED them? That’s not really a question ….
    • Reply•Share ›
    Dusty Koellhoffer Humphrey Chimpden Earwicker • an hour ago
    As everyone points out Bush told no lie. Everyone believed Saddam had WMDs. There is just no way to prove he had them and transported them all to Syria during the invasion, but they Syrians sure have a buttload of them without ever having developed their own chemical weapons plants for people to complain about.

    ISIS would never have come into existence under Saddam. But they also would never have come into existence if Obama wasn’t backing the Muslim Brotherhood against all secular authorities in the region and pulled all American troops out of Iraq. So your assertions are worthless.
    • Edit• Reply•Share ›
    Humphrey Chimpden Earwicker Dusty Koellhoffer • 15 minutes ago
    People who weren’t fooled by right-wing phony data didn’t believe it. And for the record, I’m disgusted that Hillary Clinton fell for it.
    • Reply•Share ›
    celies Humphrey Chimpden Earwicker • an hour ago
    Bull, our soldiers shouldn’t have been pulled out and they will tell you that! The pullout left a vacuum that Isis took advantage of!!
    • Reply•Share ›


Leave a Reply to dustyk103 Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.