Refuting Global Warming science is elementary, part II

Al Gore hockey stick vs history

Leftist global warming hucksters create graphs to fool the unwitting.  Government reports of climate change can no longer be trusted to relay truthful information, let alone accurate reports.  The Left’s global warming scam to dupe people out of their money and decrease American energy is all about expanding Communist power in the world.

In response to my first article, “Refuting Global Warming science is elementary,” some liberals have thought to challenge the facts with “science” that “proves” debunking this fraud can be debunked.  Here is how easy it is to ‘debunk the debunkers’ of debunking global warming.

Here is a list of several liberal assertions that purportedly refute my article, and the responses that refute them back proving that the leftist global warming agenda is a complete fraud:

  1. “Right-wingers deny science that proves climate change is real!”
    1. No, we do not deny that climate change is real. We deny leftists who confuse the issue by merging what they believe to be the cause with the reality of climate change.  When someone says climate change;
      1. The leftist thinks that climate change is driven by man’s pollution of fossil fuel emissions causing a “greenhouse effect.”
      2. The righteous know that climate change is driven by the Sun as science has proven by correlating solar output with global temperatures.
  • The fact that other planets warm and cool at the same rate as Earth renders any claims of mankind’s involvement in the process absurd unless they believe man has the same effect on the climate of Mars.  Because of this, when someone declares, “those who don’t believe in global warming don’t believe science, they’re just ‘flat-earthers,’” it is a declaration of ignorance.

Solar vs Carbon output

Global temperatures have always followed solar activity, not carbon pollution

  1. “Science has proven that CO2 creates a ‘greenhouse effect.’”
    1. There is no scientific experiment that has proven any such thing. There is no way to conduct such an experiment as it requires open air.  The only way they can do so is through computer models, and as with all things to do with computers – if you put garbage in, you get garbage out.
  2. “No one said that CO2 is forming a greenhouse bubble in the upper atmosphere.”
    1. Really? Global warming advocates never said that?  Let me draw you a picture from Al Gore’s movie:

greenhouse_effect2 Remember this picture?

  1. “What we said was that carbon absorbs heat more than oxygen and nitrogen in the atmosphere.”
    1. So what? Carbon is at the surface.  Even when it is burned or decomposes to become a gas it is still heavier than air and settles to the ground.  All life on Earth is carbon based and carbon has been on the surface since the Earth formed and life began.  Wind convection and turbulence caused by hot air rising and cool air falling will not change that fact.  Nor will any bogus “science” that you come up with to disprove the physics of the elements.
  2. “Ice sheets are melting and won’t be there to reflect heat back into space.”
    1. Ice sheets form at the polar caps. The whole reason they do so is because there is no direct sunlight.  If you know anything about the polar caps, you know that during winter the Sun doesn’t even get above the horizon, and when it does, the ice melts.  According to Al Gore in his movie, “An Inconvenient Truth,” the North polar ice cap would be melted by this time and not return.  Let’s see what it looks like in this picture.


Claims that 2014 is the hottest year on record have been proven false.

  1. Lastly, “the heating the planet will cause the sea levels to rise and droughts to become widespread.”
    1. This argument is rendered ludicrous because this is a water planet. Such an assertion takes no account of how the climate works.  Warming the atmosphere would cause more evaporation from the oceans making the atmosphere more saturated with moisture.  More moisture means more rain.
    2. This is the entire reason the equatorial region is tropical rain forest, which expands as the planet warms. This is what actually happened when the planet entered this current warm period between Ice Ages.  If the planet warmed further it would continue to expand, permafrost zones would decrease, and temperate zones would also expand.
    3. The Earth wouldn’t dry up and become a desert! The deserts of the world do not exist because of the warm weather, but because of the dynamics of global wind patterns.  Furthermore, claims that sea levels rise with melting polar ice are proven false by the fact that levels have not risen even an inch since Al Gore made his movie claiming they would rise 25 feet by 2020.  They have not risen or fallen in centuries of recorded history wherein temperatures have been significantly warmer or cooler than they are today.
    4. (Note to Al, don’t make predictions that must come true in your lifetime or everyone will find out that you’re a liar and a fool.)
    5. Now global warming advocates say it will happen in a hundred years, but they need your money now and need to take away your energy sources now to save the future. The question is; who has that crystal ball, because no scientist, living or dead, has yet been able to predict anything in the future with any accuracy.  They can’t predict the weather tomorrow, but claim they can predict it in a hundred years.

The fact is that if there was any truth to CO2 accumulation causing changes in global temperatures they would be quoting weather balloon data rather than CO2 output from cities and correlating that to temperatures.  But the last fifteen years have proven Al Gore’s “hockey stick” graph of global temperatures to be false.  Currently, the government has made weather data accumulation and reporting extremely difficult to publish without bringing down the government’s ire – or, more correctly, the hatred and anger of Democrats, for exposing their lies.

Like their new claim that now it is Natural Gas (methane) that is an even greater greenhouse gas threat than CO2.  Methane was touted as cleaner burning than oil, and now it is condemned as more dangerous, not because of any proof, but because the U.S. is now the world leader in Natural Gas production.  The truth of the Democrat’s the entire global warming agenda is revealed as not being about “saving the planet.”  It’s about reducing U.S. energy to save their favored socialist nations like Russia, China, and Islamists to gain power, and they are being paid to do it.

When the truth is known

Climate change does not occur in the vacuum of leftist global warming science.  This makes their global warming science as vacuous as the young minds, entirely ignorant of the sciences, who believe them.  Only by actually learning science, and not just believing the Chicken Littles of the world out to swindle people of their money, will young people realize they are being duped.

The joke of making methane the new CO2 is found in how measurements are taken and reported on global warming TV programs like “Years of Living Dangerously.” They imply rather than prove how much methane is in the atmosphere, misleading viewers to come to wrong conclusions.  When the “scientists” start taking measurements around sewers and gasp at how high methane levels are the joke becomes hilarious.  These poor fools act like they don’t know what comes out of their butts, and this is why cow farts have become a “danger to the planet!”

Understanding this is not complicated, but America’s corrupted education system, and parents not teaching their children morals to recognize liars, are the root causes of this failure.  Realizing that global warming science run by the people in government is a fraud, dreamed up by charlatans to fool people into giving them their money to “save the world,” just takes a little more knowledge, and thinking on more than a grade school level.  That is why taking everything they claim to be science fact and proving it to be science fraud is elementary.

Refuting Global Warming Science is Elementary part I

Refuting Global Warming Science is Elementary part III

Climate Change Deniers vs. Chicken Littles

Politico-economics of climate change eco-terrorism explained

Related articles;

Proof of fraud – the Democrat agenda to tax Americans

Earth Day: Having the good sense to recognize the climate change fraud

BOOM!  Greenpeace co-founder confesses climate change fraud

Other articles;

Racism – the colossal ignorance of the Left’s language of division

Christians crushed the Inquisition, Moslems endorse the Jihad

The Final Solution to Islamic terrorism

(Please like, follow, and share this with your friends.  Let them know the truth.)

About dustyk103

This site is my opinion only and is unpaid. I am a retired Paramedic/Firefighter with 25 years of service in the City of Dallas Fire Dept. I have a B.A. degree in Journalism, and A.A. degrees in Military Science and History. I have spent my life studying military history, world history, American history, science, current events, and politics making me a qualified PhD, Senior Fellow of the Limbaugh Institute, and tenured Professor Emeritus for Advanced Conservative Studies. 😄 It is my hope that readers can gain some knowledge and wisdom from my articles.
This entry was posted in Climate Change, Conservatism vs. Liberalism and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Refuting Global Warming science is elementary, part II

  1. Arthur W. DiMatteo says:

    I like the picture from Al Gore’s movie, Dusty. It seems to me that you may be interpreting that picture in an entirely different way, and I actually can see why, with the way the highlighting is done. You wouldn’t necessarily interpret it that way though, certainly I hope you can see how a simplified picture like that could be interpreted more than one way.


  2. dustyk103 says:

    This remark was made on FB:

    Mike435 Dusty Koellhoffer • 4 hours ago
    Truly one of the most ignorant rants I seen in a while.

    “These scientists, who claim they understand the science of global warming because they have doctorates and you are just an ignorant boob, are living a lie. If they are so smart, why do they say CO2, a heavier than air gas, is rising and accumulating in the upper atmosphere? If they are so smart, why do they say the melting of the north polar ice, which is a giant ice cube floating on the ocean, will flood the world? If they are so smart, why do they throw this sh*t at us like a bunch of dumb monkeys?” [From DK’s first link.]

    Yes Dusty, I have a doctorate and you are an ignorant boob. Here is the proof: No one claims melting of Arctic Sea ice will raise sea levels. It is the melting of Greenland and Antarctic land ice that we are concerned about raising sea levels. And gasses mix because they are gasses! H2O is lighter that O2 or N2 but it does not float away! And do not blame others because your pants are soiled.
    1 • Reply•Share ›
    Dusty Koellhoffer Mike435 • 7 minutes ago
    Thank you for making my point. Al Gore refers only to the North polar ice melt flooding the world. Greenland and Antarctica are in far less danger of melting because they are on land, so you are perpetuating what you know is a lie. And your gas example is ludicrous. Are you actually trying to say that water doesn’t float away, or worse, that steam doesn’t? Guess you forgot what makes clouds, Mr. doctorate. I was talking about CO2 and the lie that it forms a greenhouse bubble around the Earth. And obviously you are not so educated you are beyond referencing toilet insults. You shouldn’t claim to have a higher degree when you’re a common idiot.

    Mike435 Dusty Koellhoffer • 11 hours ago
    Dusty is too stupid to have a conversation with, but he illustrates something interesting. Cruz is very smart and very dogmatic. Dusty is every bit as dogmatic in his thinking, but is as dumb as he is dogmatic. Cruz needs people like Dusty and Cruz knows how use them. If someone is dumb but not dogmatic it may still be possible to reach them. It does not take a genius to figure out scientists know more about science than a radio shock jock. People like Dusty are hopeless.

    There are Dusty’s of left too. They are no better. Sometimes these people randomly flip sides, but remain just as dogmatic.
    • Reply•Share ›
    Dusty Koellhoffer Mike435 • in a few seconds
    Funny you should mention “Dusty’s of the left” as if you’re not one of them. You don’t know me to make such judgments, which only proves you to be a far left fanatic. You should really try looking up the definition of dogma. The proofs of liberal lies I offer blow your liberal rant down the toilet.
    • Edit• Reply•Share ›


  3. dustyk103 says:

    Fields82 Dusty Koellhoffer • 10 hours ago
    Now check out Nasa. You know a non biased site with real facts and scientific studies. Pretty amazing when you actually look at a non partial source. It is easy to find someone who agrees with you, it is less easy to admit that you are wrong when you are presented with facts. Give it a shot and do some real reading.
    • Reply•Share ›
    Dusty Koellhoffer Fields82 • in a few seconds
    NASA lost all credibility as “unbiased” when Obama took charge and ordered them to change their mission from purely space exploration to Moslem outreach to teach Moslems that Islam enhanced science education, a proven fallacy. There are no “impartial” government sources, and even private sources are suspect when they receive government subsidies, when the president is a proven pathological liar with an anti-American agenda. None government sources all say that climate change is effected by solar output, volcanoes spew more contaminants into the atmosphere, not vice versa as new global warming scientists now claim, that man’s effect on the climate is unknown (mostly because it is so small), and no one can predict the future.
    • Edit• Reply•Share ›


  4. dustyk103 says:

    Another FB exchange;

    Metrocity Dusty Koellhoffer • 14 hours ago
    Greenhouse bubble? See, now here’s the problem. It’s like the creationists who think evolutionary biologists believe humans descended from apes.
    • Reply•Share ›
    Dusty Koellhoffer Metrocity • 14 hours ago
    No, they think evolutionary biologists believe humans evolved from apes, which would be correct. Descent is a little different, but if one of your ancestors from ten million years ago is an ape, is it wrong?
    • Edit• Reply•Share ›
    Metrocity Dusty Koellhoffer • 13 hours ago
    And there’s my point. Evolutionary biologists think that humans are apes – a group that contains chimps, gorillas, humans, and so on. And most importantly, all these animals have a common ancestor. Creationists might as well think science is saying apes evolved from humans. They would be just as wrong. You don’t understand climate science. Climate scientists don’t exactly either. But a whole lot more than you. It’s super complicated and takes years and years of full time education to just get a handle on some little portion of it. There’s just no way that someone who hasn’t dedicated an equal amount of time to the topic is going to have any credible criticisms.
    • Reply•Share ›
    Dusty Koellhoffer Metrocity • a few seconds ago
    They believe no such thing! We are not the same species, nor is there a direct link to make such an assertion between apes and man because there are vast gaps in the evolutionary chain. That is why it is called the “Theory of Evolution.” Your rather lengthy reasoning that I couldn’t understand climate science because it is an expansive field of study is just another way of saying only degreed experts can understand it and the rest of us are dumb monkeys who couldn’t understand it. This is the typical liberal argument that you must be a master engineer to change a tire. The lies presented to back up climate science that claims global warming is man-made is very understandable and easily exposed as I do in my articles.
    • Edit• Reply•Share ›

    Metrocity Dusty Koellhoffer • an hour ago
    And there you go demonstrating my point. Ape isn’t a species of animal. There’s no animal out there that is an “ape”. Apes are the super family Hominoidae. Included are humans, and other apes. Chimps, gorillas, and so on. How can you argue against an idea you don’t even understand? Again, how can you argue against an idea you don’t even understand!? And climate science is infinitely more complicated than taxonomy. This isn’t a liberal argument. I’m conservative, and skeptical of the political motives of anthropogenic global warming advocates. I’ve also spent years and years of my life studying math, chemistry, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, fluid dynamics – all fields heavily used by scientists building the case for global warming. That you think their case is so simple and flawed that you don’t need to know anything more than the junk you read on the internet just shows how ignorant you are.
    • Reply•Share ›
    Dusty Koellhoffer Metrocity • a minute ago
    And that is where you are wrong. I didn’t say anything about apes being a species. You assume I don’t know what I’m talking about because I don’t have a degree, which is just self-righteous hypocrisy. You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to understand that the global warming agenda of the Democrat Party is a fraud to part fools from their money. And if you think a degree confers upon you a lack of ignorance, you are the fool.
    • Edit• Reply•Share ›


    Sure you did Dusty. “We are not the same species, nor is there a direct link to make such an assertion between apes and man … ”
    Look, this isn’t gender studies. You can’t just step in and start pulling crap out of thin air. These are the physical sciences. It takes years of full time study, which usually earns someone – *gasp* – a degree. It’s responsible for stuff like supersonic jets. Bioengineered crops. Medical imaging. So, of course you don’t know what you are talking about. Not that a degree would mean you do, but not having one almost certainly mea ns you don’t. And it’s not just that you don’t know anything about it. You have no idea how much you don’t know.
    12:54 p.m., Thursday March 26 | Other comments by Metrocity

    Dusty Koellhoffer Metrocity • in a few seconds
    You are deliberately quibbling over minutiae and taking my words out of context. There is no species of ape that is the same as the species of homo sapien. Is that clear enough? Because it certainly proves you are attempting to distract from the facts.

    Likewise, your assumption that I am somehow denigrating degrees and education. It is a lack of education that is allowing Democrats to dupe the general populace with their global warming scam. I have every idea of how much I don’t know and I have since I was sixteen. People are phenomenally ignorant and those who do not educate themselves are easily fooled by people like Obama who tell them he’s trying to save the planet so they must give him more of their money and do with less. All of it is an agenda to reduce American influence in a world that has only benefited from America which has kept the worst of governments in check for decades.
    • Edit• Reply•Share ›


  5. Richard McClellan says:

    Could you give me a source for the opening graphs?
    I like the way you distinguish between climate change–which is real always has been and always will be–and climate change “science ” which is a questionable use of the term.
    My point always is: climate changes–that is what it does. If you have a choice, take warming every time. You want to reduce the population of humans by about 99 percent? Bring on a full blown Ice Age.


Leave a Reply to dustyk103 Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.